EPA delays new rules on coal ash


CSA Z462 Arc Flash Training – Electrical Safety Compliance Course

Our customized live online or in‑person group training can be delivered to your staff at your location.

  • Live Online
  • 6 hours Instructor-led
  • Group Training Available
Regular Price:
$249
Coupon Price:
$199
Reserve Your Seat Today
The Obama administration announced it would delay the release of proposed new rules on the handling and disposal of toxic ash from coal-fired power plants.

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Lisa Jackson had promised the rules proposal would be issued before the end of the year.

In a prepared statement, EPA did not offer a new timeline, but said the delay was for a "short period" and that the proposal would be issued "in the near future."

EPA cited the "complexity of the analysis" involved in the issue and said agency officials are "still actively clarifying and refining parts of the proposal."

"Administrator Jackson has been committed since the beginning of her administration to complete these efforts, and expects to issue a proposed rule in the near future," EPA said in its prepared statement.

EPA officials announced the delay just five days before the one-year anniversary of the December 22, 2008, collapse of a coal-ash impoundment at a Tennessee Valley Authority power plant in East Tennessee.

The spill at TVA's Kingston Plant sent more than 1 billion gallons of coal ash — containing more than 2.6 million pounds of toxic pollutants — pouring into local streams, fields and homes. The disaster gave new momentum to a long-standing campaign by environmental groups to more strictly regulate power plant ash.

Generally, coal-ash is not subject to any concrete set of national standards to govern the safety of the impoundments or toxic pollution that leaches from them. Rules vary widely from state to state.

For years, EPA was under congressional orders to decide if coal ash should be regulated as a hazardous waste. The Clinton administration moved to do so, but the Bush administration reversed the action.

In October, a U.S. Government Accountability Office report said the Obama administration was considering a "hybrid" approach that would regulate some coal-ash dumps as hazardous waste sites and subject others to less strict non-hazardous waste rules.

EPA's delay in issuing proposed rules also comes just after an industry group warned in congressional testimony that an EPA hazardous waste designation for coal ash could force nearly 200 coal-fired power plants nationwide to close.

"A national coal combustion products regulation will alter the technology and economics of coal-fired power plants," Ken Ladwig of the Electric Power Research Institute told a House subcommittee. "Some owners would decide to prematurely shut down rather than incur the costs of compliance, while others would convert their ash handling and disposal systems and continue to operate in the post-regulation market."

Earthjustice attorney Lisa Evans, a longtime advocate of tougher coal-ash regulations, called the EPA delay "unfortunate" and said she hopes that EPA "will prevail over the power industry's fear mongering and campaign of disinformation." Evans said many communities where coal-ash disposal sites are located "have been waiting decades for the protection that only EPA can deliver.

"It is impossible to imagine that the imposition of basic landfilling standards will bring down the U.S. power industry," Evans said. "It just won't happen."

Related News

Hydro wants B.C. residents to pay an extra $2 a month for electricity

BC Hydro Rate Increase proposes a 2.3% hike from April, with BCUC review, aligning below…
View more

COVID-19 pandemic zaps electricity usage in Ontario as people stay home

Ontario Electricity Demand 2020 shows a rare decline amid COVID-19, with higher residential peak load,…
View more

Is nuclear power really in decline?

Nuclear Energy Growth accelerates as nations pursue decarbonization, complement renewables, displace coal, and ensure grid…
View more

Mercury in $3 billion takeover bid for Tilt Renewables

Mercury Energy Tilt Renewables acquisition signals a trans-Tasman energy push as PowAR and Mercury split…
View more

Is Ontario embracing clean power?

Ontario Clean Energy Expansion signals IESO-backed renewables, energy storage, and low-CO2 power to meet EV-driven…
View more

Secret Liberal cabinet document reveals Electricity prices to soar

Ontario Hydro Rate Relief Plan delivers short-term electricity bill cuts, while leaked cabinet forecasts show…
View more

Sign Up for Electricity Forum’s Newsletter

Stay informed with our FREE Newsletter — get the latest news, breakthrough technologies, and expert insights, delivered straight to your inbox.

Electricity Today T&D Magazine Subscribe for FREE

Stay informed with the latest T&D policies and technologies.
  • Timely insights from industry experts
  • Practical solutions T&D engineers
  • Free access to every issue

Live Online & In-person Group Training

Advantages To Instructor-Led Training – Instructor-Led Course, Customized Training, Multiple Locations, Economical, CEU Credits, Course Discounts.

Request For Quotation

Whether you would prefer Live Online or In-Person instruction, our electrical training courses can be tailored to meet your company's specific requirements and delivered to your employees in one location or at various locations.