Fukushima Nuclear Disaster Could Cost $257 Billion

TOKYO - - Nuclear power generated electricity may appear cheap, but like fossil fuel electricity generation much of the real cost is hidden in subsidies and other forms of support. Add to that a nuclear accident or even just other associated environmental impacts under normal operations and suddenly any savings quickly evaporate, like water on overheated nuclear fuel rods.

According to a report from Reuters, based on data from the Nikkei, it's been estimated cleaning up after the Fukushima nuclear disaster and compensation costs could be as high as 20 trillion yen - USD$257 billion.

While the Fukushima crisis doesn't dominate the headlines as much any more, it's an ongoing situation with nasty new surprises regularly cropping up.

Just this week, there have been two developments of note.

Operators of the Fukushima plant, Tokyo Electric Power Co. TEPCO, announced on Monday 45 tonnes of highly radioactive waste water had leaked from the plants water treatment system.

Yesterday, TEPCO estimated 300 litres of the waste water ran into a nearby gutter that leads to the Pacific Ocean, with around 150 litres actually reaching the ocean. That water is believed to contain around 26 billion becquerels of radioactive materials, including strontium. According to some reports, that is a million times higher than accepted safe levels.

This morning, ABC News has reported radioactive caesium has been detected in a brand of Japanese baby formula sparking a recall of 400,000 cans.

Radioactive food, water and land - in fact, radioactive everything - aren't the only environmental hazards to be generated by the Fukushima nuclear disaster. The cleanup of the mess is creating other problems, such as the pileup of 480,000 used disposable protective suits reported by the ABC back in October. Contaminated soil being hurriedly stored around the nation is also causing concern.

As Australia continues its journey towards its wind and solar powered clean energy future, it's all food for thought as we strike agreements with countries such as India to supply uranium for power generation purposes. Let's not forget the millions of tonnes of coal and other fossil fuels we export around the world each year either.

Can we every really lay claim to being clean and green by shipping the essential ingredients for major environmental disasters to other nations? Is Australia the Typhoid Mary of energy?

Related News

iran solar and wind

Iran to Become Regional Hub for Renewable Energies

TEHRAN - Deputy Energy Minister on Renewable Energies Affairs says the U.S. sanctions have currently affected the economic, banking and forex sectors of the country as the country‘s medicine is under sanctions and it means renewable energies are also under sanctions.

Speaking in a press conference yesterday, Mohammad Satkin said leading countries first focus on productivity then they turn to electricity production and the ministry in the first step has focused on productivity then on renewables, reiterating that the ministry will use all existing potentials in this regard especially in utilizing wind.

He added that the ministry is doing its best that…

READ MORE
ermineskin electricity

Ermineskin First Nation soon to become major electricity generator

READ MORE

Aerial 3D Survey Image

New Photogrammetry Software Optimized for Aerial Drone Photography

READ MORE

should-california-fund-biofuels-or-electric-vehicles

Should California Fund Biofuels or Electric Vehicles?

READ MORE

renewable energy protest

Why the shift toward renewable energy is not enough

READ MORE