EPA to delay biomass permit requirements
"We are working to find a way forward that is scientifically sound and manageable for both producers and consumers of biomass energy. In the coming years, we will develop a common sense approach that protects our environment and encourages the use of clean energy," said EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson.
The EPA said that it plans to finish by July a rulemaking that will defer permitting requirements for CO2 emissions from biomass-fired and other biogenic sources for three years.
The EPA's decision affects facilities that emit CO2 from burning forest or agricultural products for energy, wastewater treatment and livestock management facilities, landfills and fermentation processes for ethanol production.
"Renewable, homegrown power sources are essential to our energy future, and an important step to cutting the pollution responsible for climate change," Jackson said.
U.S. Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack welcomed the EPA's decision, saying it will benefit farmers, ranchers and forest owners who play a crucial role in providing renewable energy from wood, switchgrass and other agricultural products.
However, Frank O'Donnell, president of Clean Air Watch, said the EPA's action is another concession to the agency's critics in both industry and Congress.
"It does mark a reversal by EPA, though the agency has made a plausible scientific case to delay these requirements," said O'Donnell. "It should remove some of the congressional heat. At the very least, EPA supporters in Congress can argue that the agency is trying to be thoughtful."
The EPA has been attacked by many U.S. lawmakers for trying to go around Congress to regulate greenhouse gas emissions. They fear such EPA rules will hurt the economy.
This month, the EPA began air permitting requirements for large greenhouse gas emitting industries that are planning to build new facilities or make major changes to existing ones.
These facilities, such as oil refineries and power plants, must obtain air permits and carry out energy efficiency measures or use cost-effective technology to reduce their greenhouse gas emissions.
Related News
As Maine debates 145-mile electric line, energy giant with billions at stake is absent
BANGOR - As Maine regulators are deciding whether to approve the construction of a $1 billion transmission line across much of western Maine, the Canadian hydroelectric utility poised to make billions of dollars from the project has been absent from the process.
This has left both opponents and supporters of the line arguing about how much available energy the utility has to send through a completed line, and whether that energy will help fulfill the mission of the project: fighting climate change.
And while the utility has avoided making its case before regulators, which requires submitting to cross-examination and discovery, it has…
