U.S. and Chinese companies deepen ties on energy policies

By ClimateWire


Substation Relay Protection Training

Our customized live online or in‑person group training can be delivered to your staff at your location.

  • Live Online
  • 12 hours Instructor-led
  • Group Training Available
Regular Price:
$699
Coupon Price:
$599
Reserve Your Seat Today
U.S. and Chinese leaders recently sought to reinforce the idea that the nations' energy and climate policies are traveling in the same direction ahead of President Hu Jintao's recent visit to the White House.

With government officials looking on, U.S. and Chinese companies signed cooperation agreements meant to speed the development and use of clean energy technology. General Electric Co., Duke Energy Corp., American Electric Power, Alcoa and Westinghouse Electric Co., among others, signed on for projects with China's largest energy producers, including the development of massive wind farms in China and tighter ties among the countries' largest utilities.

"Increasingly, we need to demonstrate the tangible benefits of this relationship," said Jon Huntsman Jr., the U.S. ambassador to China. "We need to highlight how this relationship helps improve lives here in America."

During Hu's four-day trip to Washington and Chicago, U.S. and Chinese officials will be working on a bilateral relationship that frayed over the past year. The governments have struggled for common ground on how to remove economic imbalances resulting from China's exchange rate and U.S. fiscal and monetary policies. The superpowers face challenges in North Korea, disagreements about Taiwan and a fragile military alliance.

In the underbrush of that thicket of issues are festering disputes about national policies meant to protect U.S. and Chinese clean energy jobs and shield nascent industries from tough foreign competitors. The Obama administration has challenged Chinese government subsidies for wind-power companies, and China has expressed concern about "buy American" provisions tucked in a defense authorization bill. It requires the Pentagon to purchase only American-made solar panels.

Still, much of that is being hashed out through bilateral working groups and a formal process at the World Trade Organization. Ahead of Hu's visit, some of those issues are being put aside.

Intellectual property concerns remain

Instead of focusing on the trade disputes, and potential issues such as cyber security, U.S. and Chinese officials are framing the U.S.-China relations on energy and global warming as strong, and getting stronger. It is also a critical relationship, according to utility executives expanding their ties with China, even as both nations balance the need for cooperation, open markets and the protection of intellectual property.

"We focus a lot on the intellectual property of technology, but we underestimate the ability to scale these technologies, which the Chinese are doing at a very fast pace," said Duke Energy CEO Jim Rogers.

"People often forget that by 2050, virtually all of our power plants except for hydro will be retired or replaced," Rogers said. "Collaborating with the Chinese makes great sense given our challenge and given the fact that they are building today to provide electricity for the first time."

Recently, Duke and China's ENN Group signed a memorandum of understanding for joint demonstration of technology -- including clean coal plants, electric vehicles and energy efficient buildings -- in China's "eco-city" development in Langfang, China.

Company heads and government officials say collaboration is for the purpose of bringing researchers and engineers together, but also so that the United States and China, the two largest sources of carbon dioxide emissions, remain on the same page as technology to clean up power plants develops.

Focus on transmission and carbon capture

American Electric Power signed agreements with China Huaneng, China's largest power generator, and State Grid Corporation of China, the nation's largest electric utility. The companies will collaborate on electric transmission and distribution and on overcoming obstacles that could hold up technology that captures carbon emissions from coal-burning power stations.

Under one agreement, China Huaneng, AEP, the U.S. Department of Energy and the National Energy Administration of China will "perform the initial evaluation" of a post-combustion carbon capture technology developed by Huaneng. AEP and Huaneng will share data about plant operations developed by both companies.

In the United States, AEP Chairman and CEO Michael Morris said his company hopes to integrate the Chinese into AEP's signature clean energy project, a demonstration of carbon capture technology at its 1,300-megawatt Mountaineer coal plant in New Haven, West Virginia. AEP has been capturing and injecting about 2 percent of its carbon emissions underground since 2009, and it plans to scale up to 20 percent by 2015.

U.S. and Chinese utilities are keeping an eye on Mountaineer, the largest carbon capture and storage CCS demonstration project at an existing coal station. AEP has the largest fleet of coal-burning power plants in the country.

The latest U.S. coal-fired power plants are about as efficient as they're going to get, Morris said. "So we're moving toward a carbon capture regime," he said. He also acknowledged the regulatory hurdles.

"Without a clearer path about which way the world is going to go on carbon," he said, "it's very difficult for [a state] to say, 'Yeah, go ahead and spend $300 or $400 million to capture carbon at the station when there's no world agreement on how to go about doing this, nor is there any U.S. requirement to go forward and do it.'"

China, through its massive utilities, could scale up the development of technology developed in both countries.

"We have to humanize these accomplishments," said Huntsman, the U.S. ambassador in Beijing. "We have to make them real in ways that citizens on both sides better see the benefits of supporting a strong U.S.-China relationship."

Partnering on Seattle company's nuclear reactor

As an example, Huntsman cited a new nuclear reactor technology being developed by a TerraPower LLC, a Seattle-based company backed by Microsoft founder Bill Gates. The technology is intended to run for decades without refueling using a slow-moving, self-sustaining wave of nuclear fission reactions.

"Right now the regulatory environment here in the U.S. means that it would take decades just to certify the design," he said. "By partnering with the Chinese they can move ahead and commercialize the technology around the world when it is proven."

Carla Hills, an international consultant and former U.S. Trade Representative, said cooperation on clean energy could build confidence between the United States and China on other priority economic and security issues.

"If we could make progress on clean energy we might be able to talk in a more constructive way about the things that worry us -- 'indigenous innovation,' industrial policy, protection of intellectual property," she said. "If we're going to work together it should be a fair kind of a partnership, but if you're my partner and you're going to steal my intellectual property, it's obviously going to create frictions."

Speaking on a panel organized by the Brookings Institution, John Holdren, director of the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy, noted that China, South Korea and Japan will invest a total of $509 billion in clean technologies by 2013 -- including solar, wind, and nuclear power energy efficiency advanced vehicles high-speed rail, and carbon capture and sequestration.

U.S. investment would total only $172 billion during the same period, assuming that Congress keeps in place existing funding for energy research and development, according to a study by the National Academy of Sciences and other partners.

China's dependence on coal for electricity will grow at least through 2020, but it hopes to stanch that growth through investments in electric vehicles, energy efficiency and renewable energy. "The implementation of the strategy is dependent upon the mutual cooperation of our two energy partners," said Chai Songyue, president of the China Energy Research Society, at the same Brookings panel.

Zheng Bijian, chairman of the China Sciences and Humanities Forum, said the global economic crisis has fanned anxieties in U.S. government and private circles about the direction of China's economic development, and skepticism about China's intention to "stick to the path of peaceful development."

A warning about skepticism

"As your friend, if this skepticism and speculation became the mainstream of public opinion," he said, "it would do great harm to the interest of the U.S. itself as well as the common interests of China and the U.S.

"I believe none of us would like to see that happen." China has succeeded in transforming its economy in quantitative terms, but not so well qualitatively, he said. The results include imbalances in social and economic development, city and rural progress, investment and consumption and equitable distribution of incomes.

Recently, GE and China Shenhua Group formed a joint venture to license coal gasification technology. A U.S. DOE release estimated the joint venture is expected to generate more than $100 million in U.S. exports of technology and engineering. GE and China Huadian Corp. also signed a joint deal to work together on distributed combined heat and power projects in China, which DOE expects will generate $350 million in U.S. exports.

U.S. and Chinese government officials also signed an agreement to jointly support electric vehicle demonstrations in Los Angeles and Shanghai.

For its part, AEP's Morris said the Columbus, Ohio-based company brings an understanding of "smart grid" technology, an area where China's utilities say they need to gain greater knowledge.

Can China learn from AEP? "I don't think there's any chance that they won't," Morris said. "But, in the same sense, and this is important, I am not the classic Ugly American. I think we can learn a great deal from them as well."

AEP, which has the largest U.S. fleet of coal-fired power plants, started collaborating with utilities in China and India soon after the Asia-Pacific Partnership on Clean Development and Climate met for the first time in Sydney, Australia, in 2006.

At the start, Morris said, Chinese engineers visiting Columbus wanted to learn about how AEP controls heat rates at older power plants. In turn, in recent years AEP has gone to China to learn about developing high-voltage transmission lines and China's latest high-efficiency power plants.

"They're doing 1,100-kV transmission and we do 765 kV," Morris said. "We thought there was a lot we could learn, and they thought there were things they could learn from us."

Related News

Toronto Power Outages Persist for Hundreds After Spring Storm

Toronto Hydro Storm Outages continue after strong winds and heavy rain, with crews restoring power, clearing debris and downed lines. Safety alerts and real-time updates guide affected neighborhoods via website and social media.

 

Key Points

Toronto Hydro Storm Outages are weather-related power cuts; crews restore service safely and share public updates.

✅ Crews prioritize areas with severe damage and limited access

✅ Report downed power lines; keep a safe distance

✅ Check website and social media for restoration updates

 

In the aftermath of a powerful spring storm that swept through Toronto on Tuesday, approximately 400 customers remain without power as of Sunday. The storm, which brought strong winds and heavy rain that caused severe flooding in some areas, led to significant damage across the city, including downed trees and power lines. Toronto Hydro crews have been working tirelessly to restore service, similar to efforts by Sudbury Hydro crews in Northern Ontario, focusing on areas with the most severe damage. While many customers have had their power restored, the remaining outages are concentrated in neighborhoods where access is challenging due to debris and fallen infrastructure.

Toronto Hydro has assured residents that restoration efforts are ongoing and that they are prioritizing safety and efficiency, in step with recovery from damaging storms in Ontario across the province. The utility company has urged residents to report any downed power lines and to avoid approaching them, as they may still be live and dangerous, and notes that utilities sometimes rely on mutual aid deployments to speed restoration in large-scale events. Additionally, Toronto Hydro has been providing updates through their website and social media channels, keeping the public informed about the status of power restoration in affected areas.

The storm's impact has also led to disruptions in other services, and power outages in London disrupted morning routines for thousands earlier in the week. Some public transportation routes experienced delays due to debris on tracks, and several schools in the affected areas were temporarily closed. City officials are coordinating with various agencies to address these issues and ensure that services return to normal as quickly as possible, even as Quebec contends with widespread power outages after severe windstorms.

Residents are advised to stay updated on the situation through official channels and to exercise caution when traveling in storm-affected areas. Toronto Hydro continues to work diligently to restore power to all customers and appreciates the public's patience during this challenging time, a challenge echoed when Texas utilities struggled to restore power during Hurricane Harvey.

 

Related News

View more

Hydro-Quebec won't ask for rate hike next year

Hydro-Quebec Rate Freeze maintains current electricity rates, aligned with Bill 34, inflation indexing, and energy board oversight, delivering rebates to residential, commercial, and industrial customers and projecting nearly $1 billion in savings across Quebec.

 

Key Points

A Bill 34 policy holding power rates, adding 2020 rebates, and indexing 2021-2024 rates to inflation for Quebec customers.

✅ 2020-21 rates frozen; savings near $1B over five years.

✅ $500M rebate: residential, commercial, industrial shares.

✅ 2021-2024 rates index to inflation; five-year reviews after 2025.

 

Hydro-Quebec Distribution will not file a rate adjustment application with the province’s energy board this year, amid a class-action lawsuit alleging customers were overcharged.

In a statement released on Friday the Crown Corporation said it wants current electricity rates to be maintained for another year, as pandemic-driven demand pressures persist, starting April 1. That is consistent with the recently tabled Bill 34, and echoes Ontario legislation to lower electricity rates in its aims, which guarantees lower electricity rates for Quebecers.

The bill also provides a $500 million rebate in 2020, similar to a $535 million refund previously issued, half of which will go to residential customers while $190 million will go to commercial customers and another $60 million to industrial ones.

Hydro-Quebec said the 2020-21 rate freeze will generate savings of nearly $1 billion for its clients over the next five years, even as Manitoba Hydro scales back increases in a different market.

Bill 34, which was tabled in June, also proposes to set rates based on inflation for the years 2021 to 2024, contrasting with Ontario rate increases over the same period. After 2025 Hydro-Quebec would have to ask the energy board to set new rates every five years, as opposed to the current annual system, while BC Hydro is raising rates by comparison.

 

Related News

View more

Switch from fossil fuels to electricity could cost $1.4 trillion, Canadian Gas Association warns

Canada Electrification Costs: report estimates $580B-$1.4T to scale renewable energy, wind, solar, and storage capacity to 2050, shifting from natural gas toward net-zero emissions and raising average household energy spending by $1,300-$3,200 annually.

 

Key Points

Projected national expense to expand renewables and electrify energy systems by 2050, impacting household energy bills.

✅ $580B-$1.4T forecast for 2020-2050 energy transition

✅ 278-422 GW wind, solar, storage capacity by 2050

✅ Household costs up $1,300-$3,200 per year on average

 

The Canadian Gas Association says building renewable electricity capacity to replace just half of Canada's current fossil fuel-generated energy, a shift with significant policy implications for grids across provinces, could increase national costs by as much as $1.4 trillion over the next 30 years.

In a report, it contends, echoing an IEA report on net-zero, that growing electricity's contribution to Canada's energy mix from its current 19 per cent to about 60 per cent, a step critical to meeting climate pledges that policymakers emphasize, will require an expansion from 141 gigawatts today to between 278 and 422 GW of renewable wind, solar and storage capacity by 2050.

It says that will increase national energy costs by between $580 billion and $1.4 trillion between 2020 and 2050, a projection consistent with recent reports of higher electricity prices in Alberta amid policy shifts, translating into an average increase in Canadian household spending of $1,300 to $3,200 per year.

The study, prepared by consulting firm ICF for the association, assumes electrification begins in 2020 and is applied in all feasible applications by 2050, with investments in the electricity system, guided by the implications of decarbonizing the grid for reliability and cost, proceeding as existing natural gas and electric end use equipment reaches normal end of life.

Association CEO Tim Egan says the numbers are "pretty daunting" and support the integration of natural gas with electric, amid Canada's race to net-zero commitments, instead of using an electric-only option as the most cost-efficient way for Canada to reach environmental policy goals.

But Keith Stewart, senior energy strategist with Greenpeace Canada, says scientists are calling for the world to get to net-zero emissions by 2050, and Canada's net-zero by 2050 target underscores that urgency to avoid "catastrophic" levels of warming, so investing in natural gas infrastructure to then shut it down seems a "very expensive option."

 

Related News

View more

Hydro One crews restore power to more than 277,000 customers following damaging storms in Ontario

Hydro One Power Restoration showcases outage recovery after a severe windstorm, with crews repairing downed power lines, broken poles and crossarms, partnering with utilities and contractors to boost grid resilience and promote emergency kit preparedness.

 

Key Points

A coordinated response by Hydro One and partners to repair storm damage, restore outages, strengthen grid resilience.

✅ Crews repaired downed lines, broken poles, and crossarms

✅ Partners and contractors aided rapid outage restoration

✅ Investments improve grid resilience and emergency readiness

 

Hydro One crews have restored power to more than 277,000 customers following back-to-back storms, with impacts felt in communities like Sudbury where local crews worked to reconnect service, including a damaging windstorm on that caused 57 broken poles, 27 broken crossarms, as well as downed power lines and fallen trees on lines. Hydro One crews restored power to more than 140,000 customers within 24 hours of Friday's windstorm, even as Toronto outages persisted for some customers elsewhere.

'We understand power outages bring life to a halt, which is why we are continuously improving our storm response, as employee COVID-19 support demonstrated, while making smart investments in a resilient, reliable and sustainable electricity system to energize life for families, businesses and communities for years to come,' said David Lebeter, Chief Operating Officer, Hydro One. 'We thank our customers for their patience as our crews worked tirelessly, alongside our utility partners and contractors, including Ontario crews in Florida, to restore power as quickly and as safely as possible.'

Hydro One thanks all of its utility partners and contractors who assisted with restoration efforts following the windstorm (alongside similar Quebec outages that highlighted the broader impact), including Durham High Voltage, EPCOR, ERTH Power, K-Line Construction Ltd., Lakeland Power Distribution Ltd., North Bay Hydro, Sproule Powerline Construction Ltd. and Valard Construction.

Hydro One encourages customers to restock their emergency kits following these storms, which utilities such as BC Hydro have also characterized as atypical, and to be aware of support programs like our pandemic relief fund that can help during difficult periods, to ensure they're prepared for an emergency or extended power outage.

 

Related News

View more

$1 billion per year is being spent to support climate change denial

Climate Change Consensus and Disinformation highlights the 97% peer-reviewed agreement on human-caused warming, IPCC warnings, and how fossil fuel lobbying, misinformation, and astroturf tactics echo tobacco denial to mislead media and voters.

 

Key Points

Explains the 97% scientific consensus and the disinformation that obscures IPCC findings and misleads the public.

✅ 97% peer-reviewed consensus on human-caused climate change

✅ Fossil fuel funding drives denial and media misinformation

✅ IPCC and major scientific bodies confirm severe impacts

 

Orson Johnson says there is no scientific consensus on climate change. He’s wrong. A 2015 study by Drexel University’s Robert Brulle found that nearly $1 billion per year is being spent to support climate change denial. Electric utilities, fossil fuel and transportation sectors outspent environmental and renewable energy sectors by more than 10-to-1, undermining efforts to achieve net-zero electricity emissions globally. It is virtually the same strategy that tobacco companies used to deny the dangers of tobacco smoke, spending hundreds of millions of dollars to delay recognition of harm from tobacco smoke for decades, and today Trump's oil policies can similarly influence Wall Street's energy strategy. These are the same debunked sources Johnson quotes in his commentary.

The authors of six independent peer-reviewed papers on the consensus for human-caused climate change examined “the available studies and conclude that the finding of 97% consensus in published climate research is robust and consistent with other surveys of climate scientists and peer-reviewed studies,” according to an abstract in Environmental Research Letters, and public support for action is strong, with most Americans willing to contribute financially to climate solutions. Of the 30,000 scientists (people with a bachelor’s degree or higher in science) Johnson cites, only 39 specialized in climate science.

A new study by the U.N. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change draws on momentum from the Katowice climate summit to warn that “The consequences for nature and humanity are sweeping and severe.”

California’s Office of Planning and Research says: “Every major scientific organization in the United States with relevant expertise has confirmed the IPCC’s conclusion, including the National Academy of Sciences, the American Meteorological Society, the American Geophysical Union, and the American Association for the Advancement of Science. The list of international scientific organizations affirming the worldwide consensus on climate change is even longer.”

Former President Obama argued that decarbonization is irreversible as the clean-energy transition accelerates.

This issue is a symptom of an even larger problem. Recently, Facebook announced it would continue to allow political ads that contain obvious lies. America’s corporate news media has been following the same policy for years. Printing stories and commentary with information that is clearly not true or where data has been cherry-picked to strongly imply a lie, such as claims that Ottawa is making electricity more expensive for Albertans, sets up a false equivalence fallacy in which two incompatible arguments appear to be logically equivalent when, in fact, they are not.

Conservatives focus exclusively on progressive income taxes to argue that rich people pay a disproportionate share of taxes while ignoring that they take a disproportionate share of income, and federal income taxes account for less than half of taxes collected, with almost all of the other taxes being heavily regressive. Critics of single-payer healthcare disregard that almost every other developed country on earth has been using single-payer for decades to provide better care with universal coverage at roughly half the cost. Other examples abound, including recent policy milestones like the historic U.S. climate deal that nevertheless become targets of misinformation. We live in a society where truth is no longer truth, reality is supplanted by alternative facts and where crippling polarization is driven by the inability to agree on basic facts.

 

Related News

View more

U.S. Senate Looks to Modernize Renewable Energy on Public Land

PLREDA 2019 advances solar, wind, and geothermal on public lands, guiding DOI siting, improving transmission access, streamlining permitting, sharing revenues, and funding conservation to meet climate goals while protecting wildlife and recreation.

 

Key Points

A bipartisan bill to expand renewables on public lands fund conservation, speed permitting and advance U.S. climate aims.

✅ Targets 25 GW of public-land renewables by 2025

✅ Establishes wildlife conservation and recreation access funds

✅ Streamlines siting, transmission, and equitable revenue sharing

 

The Senate unveiled its version of a bill the House introduced in July to help the U.S. realize the extraordinary renewable energy potential of our shared public lands.

Senator Martha McSally (R-AZ) and a bipartisan coalition of western Senators introduced a Senate version of draft legislation that will help the Department of the Interior tap the renewable energy potential of our shared public lands. The western Senators represent Arizona, New Mexico, Colorado, Montana, and Idaho.

Elsewhere in the West, lawmakers have moved to modernize Oregon hydropower to streamline licensing, signaling broad regional momentum.

The Public Land Renewable Energy Development Act of 2019 (PLREDA) facilitates siting of solar, wind, and geothermal energy projects on public lands, boosts funding for conservation, and promotes ambitious renewable energy targets that will help the U.S. take action on the climate crisis.

Like the House version, the Senate bill enjoys strong bi-partisan support and industry endorsement. The Senate version makes few notable changes to the bill introduced in July by Representatives Mike Levin (D-CA) and Paul Gosar (R-AZ). It includes:

  • A commitment to enhance natural resource conservation and stewardship via the establishment of a fish and wildlife conservation fund that would support conservation and restoration work and other important stewardship activities.
  • An ambitious renewable energy production goal for the Department of the Interior to permit a total of 25 gigawatts of renewable energy on public lands by 2025—nearly double the current generating capacity of projects currently on our public lands.
  • Establishment of criteria for identifying appropriate areas for renewable energy development using the 2012 Western Solar Plan as a model. Key criteria to be considered include access to transmission lines and likelihood of avoiding or minimizing conflict with wildlife habitat, cultural resources, and other resources and values.
  • Improved public access to Federal lands for recreational uses via funds made available for preserving and improving access, including enhancing public access to places that are currently inaccessible or restricted.
  • Sharing of revenues raised from renewable energy development on public lands in an equitable manner that benefits local communities near new renewable energy projects and supports the efficient administration of permitting requirements.
  • Creating incentives for renewable energy development by giving Interior the authority to reduce rental rates and capacity fees to ensure new renewable energy development remains competitive in the marketplace.

NRDC strongly supports this legislation, and we will do our utmost to facilitate its passage into law. There is no question that in our era of runaway climate change, legislation that balances energy production with environmental conservation and stewardship of our public lands is critical.

PLREDA takes a balanced approach to using our public lands to help lead the U.S. toward a low-carbon future, as states pursue 100% renewable electricity goals nationwide. The bill outlines a commonsense approach for federal agencies to play a meaningful role in combatting climate change.

 

Related News

View more

Sign Up for Electricity Forum’s Newsletter

Stay informed with our FREE Newsletter — get the latest news, breakthrough technologies, and expert insights, delivered straight to your inbox.

Electricity Today T&D Magazine Subscribe for FREE

Stay informed with the latest T&D policies and technologies.
  • Timely insights from industry experts
  • Practical solutions T&D engineers
  • Free access to every issue

Download the 2025 Electrical Training Catalog

Explore 50+ live, expert-led electrical training courses –

  • Interactive
  • Flexible
  • CEU-cerified