State cuts Duke's expansion plans in half at Cliffside facility

subscribe

Duke Energy Corp. said building one coal-fired power unit west of Charlotte would cost $1.53 billion - more than half the cost for the two units it originally requested.

Add the cost of financing the project at its Cliffside facility, and the price is $1.93 billion, according to a recent ruling from the N.C. Utilities Commission. Duke asked the commission in 2005 for permission to build two 800-megawatt coal-fired units, saying it needs the extra capacity to meet future energy demand by 2011.

The Charlotte-based company is the Carolina's largest utility with about 2.3 million customers and has added 50,000 new customers a year over the past five years. The project was controversial because of air pollution and its increasing price, from an initial $2 billion to $3 billion for two units.

The commission said the company could build just one unit in a recent ruling (including a new cost estimate). Duke doesn't know whether it will move forward with the project and said it was still waiting for a state air quality permit. Environmental groups have been against the project from the start, complaining Duke hasn't explored energy efficiency programs or renewable fuels, such as solar and wind.

Coal-fired power plants are among the chief producers of industrial carbon dioxide, blamed for global warming. The 38-page commission ruling includes a three-page dissent from commissioner Robert Owens Jr., 74, a former Dare County commissioner and Gov. Jim Hunt appointee. He echoes concerns over global warming and invokes John. F. Kennedy in the comments. He was the lone vote against Duke building even one of the units, which the commission approved in a 5-1 vote.

"We are in a unique position to make the hard decisions.... We must prepare ourselves to make sacrifices for our survival on this earth," he wrote. Duke Chief Executive Jim Rogers said he supports regulating carbon dioxide through a national cap and trade system that would force companies to buy increasingly expensive credits to pollute beyond certain levels. Conditions The N.C. Utilities Commission attached conditions to approval of the new coal-fired unit for Duke.

The company must: - Retire four-1940s-era coal-fired units at Cliffside. - Spend $50 million a year on energy efficiency and demand-reduction programs and report on progress every March 1. - Retire older coal-units equal to the amount of energy saved each year from the programs. - Report every February on progress and cost of building the unit, which Duke hopes to have operating by 2011.

Related News

nuclear power

BC residents split on going nuclear for electricity generation: survey

VANCOUVER - There is a long-term need to produce more electricity to meet population and economic growth needs and, in particular, create new clean energy sources.

Increasingly, in the worldwide discourse on climate change, nuclear power plants are being touted as a zero-emission clean energy source and a key solution towards meeting reduced emissions goals. New technological advancements could make nuclear power far safer than existing plant designs.

When queried on whether British Columbia should support nuclear power for electricity generation, respondents in a new province-wide survey by Research Co. were split, with 43% in favour and 40% against.

Levels of support reached…

READ MORE
bruce power plant

Operating record for Bruce Power as Covid-19 support Council announced

READ MORE

power outage sign

Power outage update: 252,596 remain without electricity Wednesday

READ MORE

solar panel on roof of home

High Natural Gas Prices Make This The Time To Build Back Better - With Clean Electricity

READ MORE

How Should California Wind Down Its Fossil Fuel Industry?

READ MORE