Green group vows fight over King power plant
HOLLAND MARSH, ONTARIO - Ontario Nature is adding its voice to growing opposition to a gas-fired power plant in King, on the edge of the sensitive Holland Marsh.
The environmental group says it will fight any move to use a 60-year-old Hydro 1 easement across the Cawthra Mulock Nature Reserve for a transformer connecting to the power plant. A transformer tower on a nature reserve would clearly be at odds with Ontario Nature's mandate to protect wild spaces, spokesperson Amber Cowie said.
"Opening the door to infrastructure in one of the few natural areas left is really not what we want to do."
Ontario Nature owns and manages the 109-hectare reserve, between Bathurst and Dufferin Sts. north of Green Lane, one property away from the proposed plant.
In December, Ontario Power Authority chose Pristine Power of Calgary to build the 393-megawatt, $365 million peaker plant, intended to handle peak periods and emergencies, and slated to be in operation by the end of 2011.
In a letter to OPA, Mark Carabetta, conservation science manager with Ontario Nature, said the terms of the easement dictate it can only be used by a government agency, not a private company. "Accordingly, the only option available is to swiftly nullify (OPA's) selection of Pristine and move to an alternative option," he concludes.
Jeff Myers, president of Pristine, said the nature reserve easement is only one of four options under consideration. But if the company were to run its transformer lines across the reserve, it would conform to the strict terms of the easement agreement, he said: "Hydro 1 connects to us, we don't connect to them."
Related News

Overturning statewide vote, Maine court energizes Hydro-Quebec's bid to export power
BANGOR - Maine's highest court on Tuesday breathed new life into a $1-billion US transmission line that aims to serve as conduit for Canadian hydropower, ruling that a statewide vote rebuking the project was unconstitutional.
The Supreme Judicial Court ruled that the retroactive nature of the referendum last year violated the project developer's constitutional rights, sending it back to a lower court for further proceedings.
The court did not rule in a separate case that focuses on a lease for a 1.6-kilometre portion of the proposed power line that crosses state land.
Central Maine Power's parent company and Hydro-Québec teamed up on the…