Legislature wants Virginians to cut their electricity usage by 10 per cent over 15 years

RICHMOND, VIRGINIA - Energy conservation should begin at home.

Speakers told state regulators studying ways to reduce Virginia electricity use that consumers can look in the mirror for part of the solution. About 80 individuals and organizations showed up at the State Corporation Commission's Richmond headquarters to help its staff work on a conservation goal. The General Assembly this year set a goal of cutting Virginians' electricity use in the next 15 years by 10 percent from 2006 levels.

The goal is included in a law ending the state's experiment with electric deregulation. The law says it is in the public interest to promote energy conservation and efficiency, using utilities and public or private organizations to get the job done.

The SCC's role is to determine whether the 10 percent reduction can be accomplished cost-effectively and, if not, what the appropriate goal should be. Lawmakers also asked the commission to identify ways to achieve the conservation goal. Howard Spinner, director of the SCC's division of economics and finance, said that with re-regulation, getting electricity pricing right is critical to giving consumers an accurate idea of the cost of electricity and the benefits from conserving it. "If we don't get the pricing right, all the results we get (from conservation) will not be the best," he said. Some meeting participants suggested that consumers need to conserve first at home.

Others said the state needs to establish a public-interest fund to promote conservation, perhaps financed with a small fee on monthly power bills. "Serious energy conservation and efficiency must begin at home and workplace," said Robert Burnette, director of energy conservation for Dominion Virginia Power. "Consumer lifestyle and behavior changes will be required if energy conservation programs a e to achieve sustainable, long-term success." Conservation will not eliminate the need for new power plants or transmission lines in the short run, but as consumers embrace conservation and new, efficient technologies are implemented, major utility projects might be delayed or eliminated, he said.

Others worried that the SCC's recommendations not go overboard. Barry Thomas, chief lobbyist for Appalachian Power, said his utility's large business customers are concerned that demands for large-scale conservation could ruin their businesses. The SCC staff plans at least one more meeting of its work group, on Aug. 23. It must complete its report for the governor and General Assembly by mid-December.

Related News

California proposes income-based fixed electricity charges

California proposes income-based fixed electricity charges

SAN FRANCISCO - The Public Advocates Office (PAO) for the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) has proposed adding a monthly fixed charge on electric utility bills based on income level.  

The rate change is designed to lower bills for the lowest-income residents while aligning billing more directly with utility costs. 

PAO’s recommendation for the Income Graduated Fixed Charge places fees between $22 and $42 per month in the three major investor-owned utilities’ territories for customers not enrolled in the California Alternative Rates for Energy (CARE) program. As seen below, CARE customers would be charged between $14 per month and $22 a…

READ MORE

Quebec and other provinces heading toward electricity shortage: report

READ MORE

alberta wind power

'Transformative change': Wind-generated electricity starting to outpace coal in Alberta

READ MORE

ontario-ev-jobs-boom

Ontario's EV Jobs Boom

READ MORE

siemens gamesa

Siemens Energy to unlock a new era of offshore green hydrogen production

READ MORE