California cities to get refunds from power generators

CALIFORNIA - California cities and investor-owned utilities should get refunds on electricity costs now that an appeals court has determined that power generators unfairly backdated increases from 2006 to 2007.

In 2005, a group of wholesale electricity generators filed a complaint with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission arguing that they were undercompensated for some services. The FERC decided on February 23, 2007, that the new rates were reasonable and made them retroactively effective to June 1, 2006.

Six cities including Anaheim, Azusa, Banning, Colton, Pasadena and Riverside contested the decision allowing the new rates to be put into effect early, arguing that applying the increase retroactively was not permitted.

"Effectively they were seeking a rate increase," said Bonnie S. Blair, an attorney in Washington, D.C., who represented the municipalities before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia.

Blair said that her clients together will receive several hundred thousands of dollars. Other cities and utilities such as Southern California Edison and Pacific Gas and Electric should also get refunds, she said.

Individual cities and utilities will decide how and whether the refunds will be passed on to customers.

Barbara Connors, a FERC spokeswoman, had no comment.

During the 2001 electricity crisis, the FERC required wholesale electricity generators serving the state's markets to supply available electricity. The temporary measure was supposed to shore up the energy shortfall but the requirement stayed in place for several years.

Generators began arguing that they should be compensated for the costs of energy production. In 2005, a group of wholesale electricity generators through the Independent Energy Producers Association filed their complaint.

Related News

Hydro One CEO's $4.5M salary Point of Controversy

Hydro One CEO's $4.5M salary won't be reduced to help cut electricity costs

TORONTO - The $4.5 million in pay received by Hydro One's CEO is not a factor in the government's plan to cut electricity costs for consumers, an Ontario cabinet minister said Thursday amid opposition concerns about the executive's compensation.

Treasury Board President Liz Sandals made her comments on the eve of the release of the province's so-called sunshine list.

The annual disclosure of public-sector salaries over $100,000 will be released Friday, but Hydro One salaries such as that of company boss Mayo Schmidt won't be on it.Though the government still owns most of Hydro One — 30 per cent has been sold — the company is required to follow the…

READ MORE
electricity

Why Canada's Energy Security Hinges on Renewables

READ MORE

ontario power lines

Ontario takes constitutional challenge of its global adjustment electricity fee to Supreme Court

READ MORE

sask power

SaskPower reports $205M income in 2019-20, tables annual report

READ MORE

europe renewables

Europe's Renewables Are Crowding Out Gas as Coal Phase-Out Slows

READ MORE