$2.3M for coal plant could go toward new project

GREAT FALLS, MONTANA - City officials say Great Falls' $2.3 million investment in a shelved, coal-fired power plant could instead go toward a plant fueled by natural gas plant if that project is developed.

But critics contend the investment in the coal-fired Highwood Generating Station could be lost. Great Falls City Commissioner Mary Jolley says the money is "down a rat hole," and she wants the city to get it back.

The coal plant's developer, Southern Montana Electric Generation & Transmission Cooperative, has said it is dropping plans for the 250-megawatt project at a site near Great Falls, but is considering development of a natural gas plant.

Commissioners Bill Bronson and John Rosenbaum said the city's investment in the coal plant was safe. They said the money could allow the city to buy electricity generated by the gas-fired plant.

"I don't see it as a loss situation," Bronson said. "All you're doing is you're just transitioning from one type of generation to another."

Rosenbaum said the city expects the SME to acknowledge investments in the project made so far. That might give the city the ability to buy electricity generated by the gas-fired plant, he said.

"They all go into the expenses," Rosenbaum said. "We still should be in a reasonable position."

Construction on the coal plant already had begun when SME announced last month that it was considering the switch to natural gas. SME General Manager Tim Gregori said coal would remain a future option, but that "regulatory uncertainties" related to a coal plant had made raising money for the project harder.

As for the work already done, Gregori compared the situation to building a foundation for a house, then deciding to change the configuration of the rooms inside. He said a large pit dug to hold ash from a coal plant might be used for solid waste disposal by a gas plant.

Gregg Smith, a Great Falls attorney who has questioned whether the city should be in the power business, said it would be "a very fortunate coincidence" if the natural-gas-fired plant could use the concrete foundations already built for the planned coal-fired plant.

Charles Homer, permitting and compliance manager for the state Department of Environmental Quality in Helena, said the agency has had some preliminary discussions with SME representatives about a gas-fired facility, but no application has been filed.

"They've said soon," Homer said.

Gregori said SME is in the process of preparing information that could be used to apply for a state air-quality permit for a gas-fired plant.

Related News

Peterborough Distribution sold to Hydro One for $105 million.

PETERBOROUGH - The City of Peterborough said Wednesday it has agreed to sell Peterborough Distribution Inc. to Hydro One for $105 million.

The deal requires the approval of the Ontario Energy Board.

According to the city, the deal includes a one per cent distribution rate reduction and a five-year freeze in distribution rates for customers, plus:

  • A second five-year period with distribution rate increases limited to inflation and an earnings sharing mechanism to offset rates in year 11 and onward
  • Protections for PDI employees with employees receiving employment offers to move to Hydro One
  • A sale price of $105 million
  • An agreement to develop a regional…

    READ MORE

Greening Ontario's electricity grid would cost $400 billion: report

READ MORE

substation pie chart

Four Major Types of Substation Integration Service Providers Account for More than $1 Billion in Annual Revenues

READ MORE

modi

IEA praises Modi govt for taking electricity to every village; calls India 'star performer'

READ MORE

Ukraine Resumes Electricity Exports

READ MORE