Carbon capture projects up despite costs


CSA Z462 Arc Flash Training – Electrical Safety Compliance Course

Our customized live online or in‑person group training can be delivered to your staff at your location.

  • Live Online
  • 6 hours Instructor-led
  • Group Training Available
Regular Price:
$249
Coupon Price:
$199
Reserve Your Seat Today

Global CCS Projects are shifting toward the United States, as carbon capture and storage efforts target CO2 sequestration, enhanced oil recovery, and funding, despite rising costs, stalled climate policy in Europe, and delayed renewables integration.

 

In This Story

Projects capturing and storing CO2 from industry and power, shifting toward the U.S. amid rising costs and policy gaps.

  • 234 active or planned CCS projects by end-2010; net rise of 26.
  • Focus shifts from Europe to U.S.; 31 major U.S. projects.
  • Rising costs 20-30% above estimates from 2-3 years prior.
  • EOR uses CO2 to boost oil output, improving project cash flow.
  • Gorgon and Southern Company lead; China remains in R&D.

 

The number of projects for capturing greenhouse gases from power plants and factories edged up in 2010 despite soaring costs and slow progress in UN-led efforts to slow climate change, a study showed recently.

 

The focus of carbon capture and storage CCS projects also shifted more to the United States from Europe even though U.S. President Barack Obama has failed to persuade the Senate to legislate caps on U.S. greenhouse gas emissions, it said.

The Global CCS Institute said 234 CCS projects were active or planned worldwide at the end of 2010, a net rise of 26 from 2009 despite cancellations including in the Netherlands and Finland.

CCS aims to capture planet-warming carbon dioxide in fossil fuels, such as from coal-fired power plants or cement factories, and, despite debates over making CCS clean in practice, bury it in depleted oil and gas reservoirs or other underground stores. No commercial-scale projects yet exist.

"The global commitment to carbon capture and storage remains strong today," according to the Australia-based Institute, whose members include major businesses and governments of top emitters led by China, the United States, Russia and India.

But the study, published on the Institute website, pointed to rising costs that have discouraged investments due to sluggish economic growth in many developed nations.

It said recent reviews suggested costs for CCS, rising in line with those of large-scale energy projects, were "20 to 30 per cent higher than indicated in similar studies undertaken only two to three years ago."

UN reports have suggested CCS could be as important this century as a shift to renewable energies such as wind and solar power in curbing global greenhouse gas emissions.

But UN climate negotiations have failed to agree a treaty to limit emissions that would help set a global penalty on carbon emissions to promote a surge of investments in CCS, while uncertainty over UK carbon storage funding has added to investor caution too.

Among big projects in 2010, Chevron Corp began construction on the Gorgon project in Australia, due to be the biggest carbon storage project in the world. And U.S. Southern Company is going ahead with a major U.S. project.

The Institute also saw progress on promised funds. "As much as $40 billion could be available to have large-scale projects up and running this decade," it said.

It listed 77 major projects, either planned or active, at the end of 2010 including 31 in the United States, where U.S. coal is staking its future on carbon capture today. That total was up 13 overall in 2010 despite delays or cancellations to 22.

"There is a shift in focus a little bit from Europe to the United States," said Bob Pegler, general manager-Europe of the Global CCS Institute.

The change was partly because many U.S. projects were also aiming to improve cash flow by injecting carbon dioxide into semi-depleted oilfields to raise output of crude, trading at $113 a barrel recently.

Among setbacks, in October the Dutch government shelved plans for a demonstration project in Barendrecht after delays and opposition from local people.

Finnish energy company Fortum also said in October it was scrapping a Meri-Pori CCS project due to technological and financial risks.

The report said that China, the top emitter of greenhouse gases, "remains focused on research and development" for CCS. Pegler added: "If you look forward 10 or 15 years I can see China being a major, if not the dominant, player."

 

Related News

Related News

Calgary's electricity use soars in frigid February, Enmax says

Calgary Winter Energy Usage Surge highlights soaring electricity demand, added megawatt-hours, and grid reliability challenges…
View more

Kyiv warns of 'difficult' winter after deadly strikes

Ukraine Winter Energy Attacks strain the power grid as Russian missile strikes hit critical infrastructure,…
View more

Power Demand Seen Holding Firm In Europe’s Latest Lockdown

European Power Demand During Second Lockdowns remains resilient as winter heating offsets commercial losses; electricity…
View more

Military Is Ramping Up Preparation For Major U.S. Power Grid Hack

DARPA RADICS Power Grid Security targets DoD resilience to cyber attacks, delivering early warning, detection,…
View more

Nuclear alert investigation won't be long and drawn out, minister says

Pickering Nuclear False Alert Investigation probes Ontario's emergency alert system after a provincewide cellphone, radio,…
View more

Summerland solar power project will provide electricity

Summerland Solar+Storage Project brings renewable energy to a municipal utility with photovoltaic panels and battery…
View more

Sign Up for Electricity Forum’s Newsletter

Stay informed with our FREE Newsletter — get the latest news, breakthrough technologies, and expert insights, delivered straight to your inbox.

Electricity Today T&D Magazine Subscribe for FREE

Stay informed with the latest T&D policies and technologies.
  • Timely insights from industry experts
  • Practical solutions T&D engineers
  • Free access to every issue

Live Online & In-person Group Training

Advantages To Instructor-Led Training – Instructor-Led Course, Customized Training, Multiple Locations, Economical, CEU Credits, Course Discounts.

Request For Quotation

Whether you would prefer Live Online or In-Person instruction, our electrical training courses can be tailored to meet your company's specific requirements and delivered to your employees in one location or at various locations.