Solar more important than wind: Duke CEO

NORTH CAROLINA - Utilities have a tough job in picking which expensive, relatively unproven renewable energy technology to place their chips on.

Solar and wind power get about equal face-time in the news, trailed by smaller contenders like geothermal, but which gets the most press isnÂ’t necessarily a good indicator of which will be most successful.

On the American west coast, PG&E and Southern California Edison have more or less settled their bets on solar power. Now it sounds like the east coastÂ’s biggest utility, Duke Energy, is equally bullish on solar. Clean Technology Investor reports on an interview with DukeÂ’s CEO, Jim Rogers:

Rogers said that even though Duke has made large investments in wind energy, “wind will be a very small portion [of U.S. energy use] relative to solar.” Specifically, he favors the advantages of distributed solar photovoltaic generation….

Rogers said that he expects distributed solar photovoltaic generation to be the leading renewable energy resource in the U.S. in the future, taking over windÂ’s current position.

On the subject of carbon-capture and storage, Rogers called himself a “realist.” “There’s some possibility [CCS] might not work,” Rogers said, or that it might not be cheap enough.

The difference between Duke and a utility like PG&E is mostly land availability. Where the west offers plenty of wide open spaces and deserts for giant solar thermal projects, the east is more densely populated and has few open areas that arenÂ’t protected, so smaller solar power deployments will be easier to pull off.

Unfortunately, thereÂ’s also a second difference: DukeÂ’s customer base is less accepting of higher power bills. Combine that with the relatively higher cost of solar panels, and it could be years before thereÂ’s significant solar power in DukeÂ’s operating area.

In fact, Duke already lost one fight to go ahead with a $50 million solar project in North Carolina, backing out earlier this year with the complaint that local regulators wouldnÂ’t let it fund the program the way it wanted to. It had already reduced it before, from $100 million. (Update: Duke writes to say that they resolved the issue and are proceeding with the $50m plan.) Without significant changes in policy, Duke is likely to stay just where it is at the moment, fighting to keep burning coal.

Related News

hydro one

Hydro One extends ban on electricity disconnections until further notice

TORONTO - Ontario's primary electricity provider says it's extending a ban on disconnecting homes from the power grid until further notice.

Hydro One first issued the ban towards the beginning of the province's COVID-19 outbreak, saying customers needed to be able to rely on electricity while they were kept at home during the pandemic.

A spokesman for the utility says the ban was initially set to expire at the end of July, but has now been extended without a fixed end-date.

Hydro One says the move is necessary given the ongoing restrictions posed by the pandemic, as well as persistent hot weather across…

READ MORE
ford assembly line

Let’s make post-COVID Canada a manufacturing hub again

READ MORE

power-outages-mitigate-wildfire-risks

Power Outages to Mitigate Wildfire Risks

READ MORE

Energy Vault Lands $110M From SoftBank’s Vision Fund for Gravity Storage

READ MORE

thermal energy to electricity

Turning thermal energy into electricity

READ MORE