Harper pledges $6.2 billion for Lower Churchill


Substation Relay Protection Training

Our customized live online or in‑person group training can be delivered to your staff at your location.

  • Live Online
  • 12 hours Instructor-led
  • Group Training Available
Regular Price:
$699
Coupon Price:
$599
Reserve Your Seat Today

Lower Churchill Hydro loan guarantee offers federal support for clean energy in Newfoundland and Labrador, aiding transmission to Nova Scotia, easing Quebec tensions, and involving SNC-Lavalin to cut carbon emissions and boost regional grids.

 

Inside the Issue

A federal pledge to cut Lower Churchill borrowing costs and enable clean power, lowering emissions in Atlantic Canada.

  • $4.2B federal loan guarantee to reduce project financing costs
  • Clean hydro from Labrador to Newfoundland and Nova Scotia
  • Aims to cut regional carbon emissions significantly

 

Conservative Leader Stephen Harper hopes to surf a wave of Newfoundland nationalism and support for “green” energy towards a majority, pledging controversial federal financing for a $6.2 billion mega hydro project in Labrador that could cost votes in Quebec.

 

At a campaign rally, Harper pledged a “loan guarantee or equivalent financial support” for the Lower Churchill hydro development now advancing.

“This is an unprecedented opportunity, a real game-changer for the entire region to move to clean energy,” Harper told a rally, prompting a sustained ovation from about 350 supporters.

Harper moved to deflect criticism in Quebec that Ottawa should not use Quebecers’ tax dollars to subsidize a hydro project that would be in direct competition with that province’s hydroelectric giant.

He vowed to also aid other clean energy infrastructure projects “including in Quebec” that have national or regional significance, are economically and financially feasible in studies, and “significantly” reduce carbon emissions.

Still, the announcement was clearly targeted at offsetting expected seat losses in Quebec with gains in Newfoundland where the party was shut out in 2008 under then-premier Danny Williams.

Kathy Dunderdale, Williams successor as premier, said it could be enough to help turn Tory fortunes in the province. It was well-received in Nova Scotia by many, too.

But Harper’s main rival in Quebec, Bloc Québécois Leader Gilles Duceppe, denounced it as “a slap in the face to Quebec.”

However, at least one major Quebec company already stands to benefit from the megaproject now underway. SNC-Lavalin won the engineering, procurement and construction management contract for the project’s first phase.

Critics say it is not economically viable, evidenced by the fact it requires such huge public subsidies in Ottawa debates.

The mega-project will transmit power generated in Labrador via two sub-sea transmission cables, first to Newfoundland, across the island, and then across the Gulf of St. Lawrence to Nova Scotia for distribution to lucrative North American markets amid tightening timelines.

Some suggest Harper has made a “political calculation, not an economic” one.

“I think this ‘green’ stuff is a total fig leaf,” said economist Brian Lee Crowley of the Macdonald-Laurier Institute, an Ottawa-based think-tank.

Crowley said there are other cost-efficient clean energy alternatives, with natural shale gas projects coming on-stream and prices dropping.

“This is the Tories signaling to Newfoundland that they will help them in the decades-long battle to the death with Quebec over control of hydro resources in Labrador.... It’s about using Newfoundland nationalism in order to get back in the good graces of the Newfoundland voter.”

Quebec’s hydro utility reaps huge profits from cheap power it transmits from the Upper Churchill project in Labrador under a 1969 contract that did not foresee the ensuing generations’ oil crises and skyrocketing electricity prices.

Negotiations to allow Newfoundland’s hydro utility to wheel Lower Churchill electricity over the Quebec power lines have consistently ended in failure.

Conservative officials said a federal contribution would likely take the form of a $4.2 billion loan guarantee. It would allow the province to borrow money at lower rates, given Ottawa’s superior credit rating. Tax dollars would not be at risk unless the proponents of the project defaulted on the loan.

In Montreal, NDP Leader Jack Layton said he’s behind the idea of support for the Lower Churchill River project and “projects that can help reduce greenhouse gas emissions.”

But Layton said there needs to be “clear criteria” for such investments. “It shouldn’t be just political.”

 

Related News

Related News

Is nuclear power really in decline?

Nuclear Energy Growth accelerates as nations pursue decarbonization, complement renewables, displace coal, and ensure grid…
View more

How Alberta’s lithium-laced oil fields can fuel the electric vehicle revolution

Alberta Lithium Brine can power EV batteries via direct lithium extraction, leveraging oilfield infrastructure and…
View more

Europe's Worst Energy Nightmare Is Becoming Reality

European Energy Crisis shocks markets as Russia slashes gas via Nord Stream, spiking prices and…
View more

Green energy could drive Covid-19 recovery with $100tn boost

Renewable Energy Economic Recovery drives GDP gains, job growth, and climate targets by accelerating clean…
View more

'For now, we're not touching it': Quebec closes door on nuclear power

Quebec Energy Strategy focuses on hydropower, energy efficiency, and new dams as Hydro-Que9bec pursues Churchill…
View more

New Electricity Auctions Will Drive Down Costs for Ontario's Consumers

IESO Capacity Auctions will competitively procure resources for Ontario electricity needs, boosting reliability and resource…
View more

Sign Up for Electricity Forum’s Newsletter

Stay informed with our FREE Newsletter — get the latest news, breakthrough technologies, and expert insights, delivered straight to your inbox.

Electricity Today T&D Magazine Subscribe for FREE

Stay informed with the latest T&D policies and technologies.
  • Timely insights from industry experts
  • Practical solutions T&D engineers
  • Free access to every issue

Live Online & In-person Group Training

Advantages To Instructor-Led Training – Instructor-Led Course, Customized Training, Multiple Locations, Economical, CEU Credits, Course Discounts.

Request For Quotation

Whether you would prefer Live Online or In-Person instruction, our electrical training courses can be tailored to meet your company's specific requirements and delivered to your employees in one location or at various locations.