Progress Energy owes customers for overpriced coal: lawyer

subscribe

The lawyer for Florida's utility customers said that Progress Energy owes customers a refund of $61 million for buying overpriced coal.

"It is unfair to saddle customers with extra costs that Progress Energy could have avoided by purchasing a less expensive fuel," said Public Counsel J.R. Kelly.

Progress Energy defended its fuel purchasing practices and said the higher-priced coal produced more energy and ultimately saved customers millions of dollars.

"Progress Energy continually works in the customers' best interest in its fuel buying practices," said Suzanne Grant, a utility spokeswoman.

The utility could have burned cheaper coal but failed to secure a permit to do that, said Joseph McGlothlin, associate public counsel. The counsel's office has asked the Florida Public Service Commission, which regulates Florida's utilities, to order the utility to refund the money to its customers. The commission is slated to begin hearings in April and decide the case in June.

The company lost a related case before the commission in 2007. The commission in that case ordered Progress Energy Florida to pay a $13.8 million refund for buying the more expensive coal from 2003 to 2005. That money has already been refunded to the utility's 1.7 million customers. The case relates to coal purchased in 2006 and 2007.

It's unclear if or when Progress customers might see a refund, and how much. Progress Energy raised fuel charges twice last year as the cost of coal, oil and natural gas soared. State law bars utilities from profiting from fuel. It's a pass-through to consumers. The utility recently announced that it would lower bills by 11 percent, in part because fuel prices have come down.

Related News

bitcoin electricity

The Great Debate About Bitcoin's Huge Appetite For Electricity Determining Its Future

NEW YORK - There is a great debate underway about the electricity required to process Bitcoin transactions. The debate is significant, the stakes are high, the views are diverse, and there are smart people on both sides. Bitcoin generates a lot of emotion, thereby producing too much heat and not enough light. In this post, I explain the importance of identifying the key issues in the debate, and of understanding the nature and extent of disagreement about how much electrical energy Bitcoin consumes.

Consider the background against which the debate is taking place. Because of its unstable price, Bitcoin cannot serve…

READ MORE
puerto rico solar power panels

Canadian Solar and Tesla contribute to resilient electricity system for Puerto Rico school

READ MORE

wisconsin renewables

To Limit Climate Change, Scientists Try To Improve Solar And Wind Power

READ MORE

Electrification Of Vehicles Prompts BC Hydro's First Call For Power In 15 Years

READ MORE

electricity revenue meter

Opinion: With deregulated electricity, no need to subsidize nuclear power

READ MORE