Nuclear questions left unanswered

subscribe

What will keep the lights on in Ontario 10 years from now?

That question was left unanswered when the province announced it would spend $300 million to keep the Pickering nuclear station open for another decade before mothballing it.

There was no announcement on what will replace Pickering's aging Candu reactors and their 3,000 megawatts of power (about 10 per cent of Ontario's electricity capacity) after the station closes in 2020.

The provincial government wants to build two next-generation Candu reactors at its Darlington nuclear station. But the price tag on those reactors (a reported $26 billion) caused the government sticker shock, and the procurement process was suspended last June.

Environmentalists say not to worry, that a combination of renewable energy installations (wind, solar, etc.) and conservation programs will fill the power gap. But industrial power users are not counting on that. Nor should residential consumers.

While Ontario is aggressively pursuing both renewables and conservation, the province has also said repeatedly that new nuclear reactors will still be needed as the old ones are phased out. But Ontario wants the federal government to share the cost burden. That makes sense, given that Ottawa is the owner of Atomic Energy of Canada Ltd. (AECL), the Candu manufacturer. A sale of the new generation of reactors to Ontario is considered essential in order to maintain AECL as a going concern.

But the federal Conservatives seem uninterested in partnering with Ontario on the reactor project, for reasons either ideological (they don't like government-owned enterprises) or geographical (they are rooted in Alberta while AECL is based in Ontario). Instead, they have put AECL up for sale, and the reactor maker's future is now uncertain.

"We are still committed to building two new reactors and we are currently in discussion with AECL and the federal government," provincial Energy Minister Brad Duguid told reporters. "As you know the federal government decided to restructure AECL in the middle of our procurement process, which lent a complication to the discussions.Â… We are still determined to move forward, however."

That is the sound of a minister stickhandling around a difficult question. The suspicion is that Ontario Liberals think they can rag the puck on this question until after the next provincial election (in 2011).

The problem is that it takes at least 10 years from decision to completion of a new reactor, given both the engineering and regulatory hurdles involved. And the clock is ticking, loudly.

Related News

maine hydro lines

New England takes key step to 1.2 GW of Quebec hydro as Maine approves transmission line

BANGOR - The Maine DEP reviewed the Clean Energy Connect project for more than two years, before issuing permits that included additional environmental mitigation elements.

"Collectively, the requirements of the permit require an unprecedented level of environmental protection and compensatory land conservation for the construction of a transmission line in the state of Maine," DEP said in a May 11 statement.

Requirements include limits on transmission corridor width, forest preservation, culvert replacement and vegetation management projects.

"In our original proposal we worked hard to develop a project that provided robust mitigation measures to protect the environment," NECEC Transmission CEO Thorn Dickinson said in…

READ MORE

Europe's Worst Energy Nightmare Is Becoming Reality

READ MORE

U.A.E. Becomes First Arab Nation to Open a Nuclear Power Plant

U.A.E. Becomes First Arab Nation to Open a Nuclear Power Plant

READ MORE

canadian grid power lines

State-sponsored actors 'very likely' looking to attack electricity supply, says intelligence agency

READ MORE

wec deal

WEC Energy Group to buy 80% stake in Illinois wind farm for $345 million

READ MORE