NFPA 70b Training - Electrical Maintenance
Our customized live online or in‑person group training can be delivered to your staff at your location.
- Live Online
- 12 hours Instructor-led
- Group Training Available
OPG Wage Increases face Ontario Energy Board scrutiny as arbitration awards 6 percent over two years, while a 1 percent electricity rate hike, compensation cuts, and headcount concerns challenge nuclear and hydroelectric operations.
The Big Picture
OPG wage increases are a 6 percent raise over two years, despite OEB limits on electricity rates and compensation.
- Arbitrator awarded 6% over two years to unionized staff.
- OEB approved only a 1% electricity rate increase.
- $145M cut to OPG compensation in rate decision.
- Headcount and salary levels deemed excessive by regulator.
Another wage settlement by arbitration has awarded a raise for public-sector employees in Ontario. But the latest failure of the McGuinty government’s voluntary wage-restraint plan encompasses more than that – it reflects the rising consumer backlash over the province’s soaring electricity bills.
That’s because the 3,400 unionized engineers, scientists and other white-collar workers who were awarded increases of 6 per cent over two years are employees of the Ontario government’s own electrical-power-generating company.
But Ontario Power Generation will have to come up with the money just as the province’s energy regulator has sharply reduced a rate increase sought by the utility, saying its head count and salaries are too high.
The Ontario Energy Board granted the utility a 1-per-cent hike in electricity rates recently. OPG initially sought a 9.6-per-cent rate increase before scaling that back to 6.5 per cent.
“This does obviously present some challenges to us,” OPG spokesman Ted Gruetzner said. “The OEB has made it very clear what they expect us to do, so we’ll have to see how that impacts our operations.”
Arbitrator Kevin Burkett said the province’s Finance and Energy ministers wrote to OPG just before the arbitration process began in January, to remind it that “as an agency of the province [it] is subject to these obligations and expectations.”
OPG management made it clear it was seeking a wage freeze and also cancelled performance bonuses, which typically added another 2.5 per cent a year to the wages of engineers and scientists.
But Mr. Burkett said in his decision he ignored the government’s “pronouncements” on wage restraints because they are of “no binding force or effect” without legislation. His ruling caps a string of other arbitrated agreements awarding wage increases to public-sector workers.
“We’re not bound by a government desire to freeze our wages,” said Brian Robinson, a spokesman for the Society of Energy Professionals, which represents the OPG workers. “The government’s initiative to do this was apparently to address the deficit and OPG’s [electricity] rates have nothing whatsoever to do with the deficit.”
The Energy Board’s decision, released last week, effectively means that OPG cannot pass on all of its wage increases to electricity consumers. In fact, the board reduced the utility’s allowance for compensation by $145-million.
The regulator criticized OPG for not doing enough to reduce its operating costs. The company did find $85-million in cost savings last year at the urging of Energy Minister Brad Duguid, the board said in its 200-page decision, which cautions against radical change in tone, but the board said it was surprised that OPG took no further action.
“While this reduction does represent a genuine step towards cost control,” the decision said, “it is an exaggeration to call it ‘savings.’”
The board determines what rates the utility can charge for electricity generated at its nuclear stations and its regulated hydroelectric plants. Overall, OPG accounts for about 60 per cent of the electricity generated in the province, affecting Ontario firms as major consumers. It made a profit of $649-million on revenue of $5.4-billion in 2010.
The regulator noted in its decision that compensation makes up a significant portion of OPG’s operating costs. “The board is concerned with both the number of staff and the level of compensation paid, including pay packages for top executives, in light of the overall performance of the nuclear [plants],” the decision said.
The regulator acknowledged that collective bargaining agreements may make it difficult for OPG to eliminate positions quickly, but it said it is not reasonable for electricity consumers to bear these additional costs in the face of strong evidence that the positions exceed reasonable requirements.
Adam White, president of the Association of Major Power Consumers in Ontario, said there’s a lot of sensitivity, especially among industrial users in heavy industry, surrounding electricity prices.
“Generally speaking,” he said, “the Energy Board isn’t immune from the rate battle in Ontario electricity politics. None of us are.”
Related News
Related News
Electricity Prices Surge to Record as Europe Struggles to Keep Lights on
Pacific Northwest's Renewable Energy Goals Hindered
Electricity exports to New York from Quebec will happen as early as 2025: Hydro-Quebec
New Mexico Governor to Sign 100% Clean Electricity Bill ‘As Quickly As Possible’
B.C. Streamlines Regulatory Process for Clean Energy Projects
Oil crash only a foretaste of what awaits energy industry
Sign Up for Electricity Forum’s Newsletter
Stay informed with our FREE Newsletter — get the latest news, breakthrough technologies, and expert insights, delivered straight to your inbox.
Electricity Today T&D Magazine Subscribe for FREE
- Timely insights from industry experts
- Practical solutions T&D engineers
- Free access to every issue