Second Pickering A reactor restart on target


CSA Z463 Electrical Maintenance -

Our customized live online or in‑person group training can be delivered to your staff at your location.

  • Live Online
  • 6 hours Instructor-led
  • Group Training Available
Regular Price:
$249
Coupon Price:
$199
Reserve Your Seat Today
Restarting a second reactor at the Pickering A nuclear station remains on target to deliver power next fall at a cost of just under $1 billion, according to top officials of Ontario Power Generation Inc.

But acting chief executive Richard Dicerni cautioned the job is moving into the more complex phase of knitting together systems and equipment that have largely been installed, but not yet switched on.

"There are no gimme putts here," Dicerni told reporters recently after a tour of the site. "I'd love to declare victory, but there are a number of key deliverables that need to occur" before that happens.

OPG staff and contract workers are swarming through the massive plant on the lakeshore: The complex, housing the eight reactors of Pickering A and its sister station, Pickering B, stretches about 660 metres along the shoreline.

The company hasn't managed to make up for a slow start on the project, caused largely by trouble getting enough skilled workers on the job last summer.

But "there is very systematic progress being made across the board," and work is about 70 per cent completed, Dicerni said.

When Energy Minister Dwight Duncan gave OPG the go-ahead in July to restart a second mothballed reactor at Pickering, the company published a list of milestones that called for 50 per cent of construction work to be completed by Jan. 15.

But being at 70 per cent doesn't really mean the project is ahead of schedule, Dicerni said. The 50 per cent target was essentially the rock-bottom minimum amount of work that needed to be accomplished to keep it on the rails.

As it is, the project remains on the same track it was on three months ago when OPG last issued a progress update. At that point, the company increased the cost estimate about $75 million from the previous estimate of $900 million.

Related News

We Energies refiles rate hike request driven by rising nuclear power costs

We Energies rate increase driven by nuclear energy costs at Point Beach, Wisconsin PSC filings,…
View more

Australia's energy transition stalled by stubbornly high demand

Australia Renewable Energy Transition: solar capacity growth, net-zero goals, rising electricity demand, coal reliance, EV…
View more

Fuel Cell Electric Buses Coming to Mississauga

Mississauga Fuel Cell Electric Buses advance zero-emission public transit, leveraging hydrogen fuel cells, green hydrogen…
View more

Multi-billion-dollar hydro generation project proposed for Meaford military base

Meaford Pumped Storage Project aims to balance the grid with hydro-electric generation, a hilltop reservoir,…
View more

Barakah Unit 1 reaches 100% power as it steps closer to commercial operations, due to begin early 2021

Barakah Unit 1 100 Percent Power signals the APR-1400 reactor delivering 1400MW of clean baseload…
View more

Potent greenhouse gas declines in the US, confirming success of control efforts

US SF6 Emissions Decline as NOAA analysis and EPA mitigation show progress, with atmospheric measurements…
View more

Sign Up for Electricity Forum’s Newsletter

Stay informed with our FREE Newsletter — get the latest news, breakthrough technologies, and expert insights, delivered straight to your inbox.

Electricity Today T&D Magazine Subscribe for FREE

Stay informed with the latest T&D policies and technologies.
  • Timely insights from industry experts
  • Practical solutions T&D engineers
  • Free access to every issue

Download the 2026 Electrical Training Catalog

Explore 50+ live, expert-led electrical training courses –

  • Interactive
  • Flexible
  • CEU-cerified