Substation Relay Protection Training
Our customized live online or in‑person group training can be delivered to your staff at your location.
- Live Online
- 12 hours Instructor-led
- Group Training Available
The debate has pitted the two largest utilities in Texas -- Houston's Reliant Resources and Dallas-based TXU -- against each other.
The difference of opinion revolves around two pricing systems -- "zonal" and "nodal." The pricing mechanisms relate to expenses incurred when electricity is moved from individual generating plants to power centers when demand is higher than local supply and transmission capacity is inadequate to handle the load.
Under the current zonal system, local congestion costs are "socialized" and spread throughout the entire market. Each participant pays a pro rata portion of these costs based on its share of the local power load.
A new nodal system being pushed by Reliant would allocate the entire cost to the entity that creates the congestion.
The problem: The expense of implementing nodal pricing could be as much as a half-billion dollars, which ultimately would be passed on to consumers.
Many market players such as TXU question whether the ultimate benefits will be worth the cost.
However, Reliant is certain that nodal pricing is the only way to go -- at least for the Houston utility.
Jim Ajello, CEO of Reliant Energy Solutions, argues that the company is paying for congestion in Dallas and other high traffic corridors while Houston has little congestion. And companies like TXU, which owns generation in those congested areas, are "profiting unfairly" because they are being paid by the Electric Reliability Council of Texas (ERCOT) to alleviate the congestion while paying "only a fraction" of the congestion charges.
"It's a fundamental unfairness," says Ajello.
In the second quarter of 2003, he says, Reliant paid about $30 million in additional congestion costs, a quadrupling of charges.
"The problem is the costs are not properly assigned," Ajello says. "Our load share ratio is 20 percent to 25 percent because the vast majority of our load is in the Houston area, but Houston doesn't have the constraints that Dallas has."
Congestion costs created in Houston were $8 million between May 2002 and May 2003, while in North Texas congestion costs were $82 million. But Houston customers paid $50 million of the total, Ajello says.
TXU, on the other hand, "is quite happy with the current rules -- they're getting paid by everybody," he says.
Related News
NT Power Penalized $75,000 for Delayed Disconnection Notices
PG&E pleads guilty to 85 counts in 2018 Camp Fire
State-owned electricity generation firm could save Britons nearly 21bn a year?
Utilities commission changes community choice exit fees; what happens now in San Diego?
ABO to build 10MW Tunisian solar park
Two-thirds of the U.S. is at risk of power outages this summer
Sign Up for Electricity Forum’s Newsletter
Stay informed with our FREE Newsletter — get the latest news, breakthrough technologies, and expert insights, delivered straight to your inbox.
Electricity Today T&D Magazine Subscribe for FREE
- Timely insights from industry experts
- Practical solutions T&D engineers
- Free access to every issue