WikiLeaks reveal Alberta power plans


High Voltage Maintenance Training Online

Our customized live online or in‑person group training can be delivered to your staff at your location.

  • Live Online
  • 12 hours Instructor-led
  • Group Training Available
Regular Price:
$599
Coupon Price:
$499
Reserve Your Seat Today

Alberta Oil Sands Power Exports hinge on transmission lines, U.S. grid access, and Pacific Northwest capacity, as diplomatic cables, surplus electricity from oil sands operations, and a proposed north-south line raise ratepayer concerns.

 

The Latest Developments

Export of surplus oil sands electricity to U.S. markets, dependent on transmission capacity and cross-border grid access.

  • 2003 cables cite unused electricity from oil sands operations.
  • Alberta lacked lines to move power south to U.S. markets.
  • Limited westward flow via B.C. to the Pacific Northwest.

 

Internal U.S. documents published by WikiLeaks are raising questions about whether the Alberta government plans to export electricity to the United States.

 

The leaked internal U.S. diplomatic cables reveal that Murray Smith, Alberta's former energy minister, told U.S. officials in 2003 that excess electricity generated for oil sands operations could be made available for power exports to U.S. grids.

According to the documents, Smith said Alberta lacked the transmission lines needed to export the power to the United States.

"But at least for now there is limited capacity to move this west and then south through British Columbia and on to our Pacific Northwest, as energy board reports indicate in recent filings," the cable notes.

"There is almost no capacity to move it south into the U.S. Rocky Mountain states and markets further afield."

Opposition parties say a proposed multi-billion dollar north-south transmission line will be used to export that power, amid a U.S. bank bid for Alberta power, even though the Stelmach government has denied it.

"There's nothing necessarily wrong with exporting surplus power to the United States," NDP Leader Brian Mason said.

"But by hiding it, they're proceeding with a policy that will require Albertans through their electricity bill to pay for this transmission infrastructure, despite cost hike warnings from experts, which is worth billions and billions of dollars."

 

Related News

Related News

B.C. government freezes provincial electricity rates

BC Hydro Rate Freeze delivers immediate relief on electricity rates in British Columbia, reversing a…
View more

Latvia eyes electricity from Belarus nuclear plant

Latvia Astravets electricity imports weigh AST purchases from the Belarusian nuclear plant, impacting the Baltic…
View more

Sens. Wyden, Merkley Introduce Bill to Ensure More Wildfire Resilient Power Grid

Wildfire Resilient Power Grid Act proposes DOE grants for utility companies to fund wildfire mitigation,…
View more

NEW Hydro One shares down after Ontario government says CEO, board out

Hydro One Leadership Shakeup unsettles investors as Ontario government ousts CEO and board, pressuring shares;…
View more

A resilient Germany is weathering the energy crunch

German Energy Price Brakes harness price signals in a market-based policy, cutting gas consumption, preserving…
View more

Site C mega dam billions over budget but will go ahead: B.C. premier

Site C Dam Update outlines hydroelectric budget overruns, geotechnical risks, COVID-19 construction delays, BC Hydro…
View more

Sign Up for Electricity Forum’s Newsletter

Stay informed with our FREE Newsletter — get the latest news, breakthrough technologies, and expert insights, delivered straight to your inbox.

Electricity Today T&D Magazine Subscribe for FREE

Stay informed with the latest T&D policies and technologies.
  • Timely insights from industry experts
  • Practical solutions T&D engineers
  • Free access to every issue

Download the 2026 Electrical Training Catalog

Explore 50+ live, expert-led electrical training courses –

  • Interactive
  • Flexible
  • CEU-cerified