WikiLeaks reveal Alberta power plans


Electrical Commissioning In Industrial Power Systems

Our customized live online or in‑person group training can be delivered to your staff at your location.

  • Live Online
  • 12 hours Instructor-led
  • Group Training Available
Regular Price:
$599
Coupon Price:
$499
Reserve Your Seat Today

Alberta Oil Sands Power Exports hinge on transmission lines, U.S. grid access, and Pacific Northwest capacity, as diplomatic cables, surplus electricity from oil sands operations, and a proposed north-south line raise ratepayer concerns.

 

The Latest Developments

Export of surplus oil sands electricity to U.S. markets, dependent on transmission capacity and cross-border grid access.

  • 2003 cables cite unused electricity from oil sands operations.
  • Alberta lacked lines to move power south to U.S. markets.
  • Limited westward flow via B.C. to the Pacific Northwest.

 

Internal U.S. documents published by WikiLeaks are raising questions about whether the Alberta government plans to export electricity to the United States.

 

The leaked internal U.S. diplomatic cables reveal that Murray Smith, Alberta's former energy minister, told U.S. officials in 2003 that excess electricity generated for oil sands operations could be made available for power exports to U.S. grids.

According to the documents, Smith said Alberta lacked the transmission lines needed to export the power to the United States.

"But at least for now there is limited capacity to move this west and then south through British Columbia and on to our Pacific Northwest, as energy board reports indicate in recent filings," the cable notes.

"There is almost no capacity to move it south into the U.S. Rocky Mountain states and markets further afield."

Opposition parties say a proposed multi-billion dollar north-south transmission line will be used to export that power, amid a U.S. bank bid for Alberta power, even though the Stelmach government has denied it.

"There's nothing necessarily wrong with exporting surplus power to the United States," NDP Leader Brian Mason said.

"But by hiding it, they're proceeding with a policy that will require Albertans through their electricity bill to pay for this transmission infrastructure, despite cost hike warnings from experts, which is worth billions and billions of dollars."

 

Related News

Related News

Should California Fund Biofuels or Electric Vehicles?

California Biofuels vs EV Subsidies examines tradeoffs in decarbonization, greenhouse gas reductions, clean energy deployment,…
View more

Electrifying: New cement makes concrete generate electricity

Cement-Based Conductive Composite transforms concrete into power by energy harvesting via triboelectric nanogenerator action, carbon…
View more

Russia suspected as hackers breach systems at power plants across US

US Power Grid Cyberattacks target utilities and nuclear plants, probing SCADA, ICS, and business networks…
View more

Alberta shift from coal to cleaner energy

Alberta Coal-to-Gas Transition will retire coal units, convert plants to natural gas, boost renewables, and…
View more

B.C. Diverting Critical Minerals, Energy from U.S

Canadian Softwood Lumber Tariffs challenge British Columbia's forestry sector, strain U.S.-Canada trade, and risk redirecting…
View more

Big prizes awarded to European electricity prediction specialists

Electricity Grid Flow Prediction leverages big data, machine learning, and weather analytics to forecast power…
View more

Sign Up for Electricity Forum’s Newsletter

Stay informed with our FREE Newsletter — get the latest news, breakthrough technologies, and expert insights, delivered straight to your inbox.

Electricity Today T&D Magazine Subscribe for FREE

Stay informed with the latest T&D policies and technologies.
  • Timely insights from industry experts
  • Practical solutions T&D engineers
  • Free access to every issue

Download the 2026 Electrical Training Catalog

Explore 50+ live, expert-led electrical training courses –

  • Interactive
  • Flexible
  • CEU-cerified