WikiLeaks reveal Alberta power plans


NFPA 70b Training - Electrical Maintenance

Our customized live online or in‑person group training can be delivered to your staff at your location.

  • Live Online
  • 12 hours Instructor-led
  • Group Training Available
Regular Price:
$699
Coupon Price:
$599
Reserve Your Seat Today

Alberta Oil Sands Power Exports hinge on transmission lines, U.S. grid access, and Pacific Northwest capacity, as diplomatic cables, surplus electricity from oil sands operations, and a proposed north-south line raise ratepayer concerns.

 

The Latest Developments

Export of surplus oil sands electricity to U.S. markets, dependent on transmission capacity and cross-border grid access.

  • 2003 cables cite unused electricity from oil sands operations.
  • Alberta lacked lines to move power south to U.S. markets.
  • Limited westward flow via B.C. to the Pacific Northwest.

 

Internal U.S. documents published by WikiLeaks are raising questions about whether the Alberta government plans to export electricity to the United States.

 

The leaked internal U.S. diplomatic cables reveal that Murray Smith, Alberta's former energy minister, told U.S. officials in 2003 that excess electricity generated for oil sands operations could be made available for power exports to U.S. grids.

According to the documents, Smith said Alberta lacked the transmission lines needed to export the power to the United States.

"But at least for now there is limited capacity to move this west and then south through British Columbia and on to our Pacific Northwest, as energy board reports indicate in recent filings," the cable notes.

"There is almost no capacity to move it south into the U.S. Rocky Mountain states and markets further afield."

Opposition parties say a proposed multi-billion dollar north-south transmission line will be used to export that power, amid a U.S. bank bid for Alberta power, even though the Stelmach government has denied it.

"There's nothing necessarily wrong with exporting surplus power to the United States," NDP Leader Brian Mason said.

"But by hiding it, they're proceeding with a policy that will require Albertans through their electricity bill to pay for this transmission infrastructure, despite cost hike warnings from experts, which is worth billions and billions of dollars."

 

Related News

Related News

A resilient Germany is weathering the energy crunch

German Energy Price Brakes harness price signals in a market-based policy, cutting gas consumption, preserving…
View more

Ontario Providing Support for Industrial and Commercial Electricity Consumers During COVID-19

Ontario Global Adjustment Deferral provides COVID-19 relief to industrial and commercial electricity consumers, holding GA…
View more

Bruce Power cranking out more electricity after upgrade

Bruce Power Capacity Uprate boosts nuclear output through generator stator upgrades, turbine and transformer enhancements,…
View more

California’s Solar Power Cost Shift: A Misguided Policy Threatening Energy Equity

California Rooftop Solar Cost Shift examines PG&E rate hikes, net metering changes, and utility infrastructure…
View more

Electricity Demand In The Time Of COVID-19

COVID-19 Impact on U.S. Power Demand shows falling electricity load, lower wholesale prices, and resilient…
View more

Ukraine Resumes Electricity Exports

Ukraine Electricity Exports resume as the EU grid links stabilize; ENTSO-E caps, megawatt capacity, renewables,…
View more

Sign Up for Electricity Forum’s Newsletter

Stay informed with our FREE Newsletter — get the latest news, breakthrough technologies, and expert insights, delivered straight to your inbox.

Electricity Today T&D Magazine Subscribe for FREE

Stay informed with the latest T&D policies and technologies.
  • Timely insights from industry experts
  • Practical solutions T&D engineers
  • Free access to every issue

Download the 2026 Electrical Training Catalog

Explore 50+ live, expert-led electrical training courses –

  • Interactive
  • Flexible
  • CEU-cerified