Montana cooperative ends plan to build coal plant

GREAT FALLS, MONTANA - Six months after it said it was postponing construction of a 250-MW coal-fired plant east of Great Falls, Montana, Southern Montana Electric Generation and Transmission Cooperative has officially scrapped the project, a state official said.

The Montana Department of Environmental Quality said it received a request from the co-op earlier this week to revoke the air permits for the proposed $900 million Highwood Generating station and will instead build a 120-MW natural gas fired plant.

Brent Lignell an environmental engineer with the DEQ, said the utility is now seeking an air permit for the gas-fired plant that will be built at the same site.

Cooperative officials did not return calls seeking comment about their reasons for ending the coal project. In early February the utility said it was postponing construction of the coal-fired plant because of delays in securing permits and financing and would instead build the gas-fired plant and a 6-MW wind farm to meet what it said is a pressing need for power.

Environmental activists, however, claimed partial responsibility for killing the project, which they have been battling since DEQ issued the co-op a draft permit in 2006.

Anne Hedges, program manager of Montana Environmental Information Center, said the co-op scrapped the coal-fired project after it failed to obtain financing from the U.S. Department of Agriculture's Rural Utilities Service and "because of the uncertainty caused by the lawsuits we filed at every turn."

A coalition of state and federal environmental groups, including the MEIC, challenged the draft air quality permit because it lacked limits for carbon dioxide and fine particulate matter, according to Hedges.

The groups followed up by suing RUS for failing to consider the impacts of global warming in the environmental analysis it conducted on the facility.

RUS in February 2008 said it was withdrawing its funding for the Highwood plant and from all other coal-fired projects it was considering, citing uncertainty over future regulation of CO2 emissions.

Related News

douglas kee

Investor: Hydro One has too many unknowns to be a good investment

TORONTO - Hydro One may be only half-owned by the province on Ontario but that’s enough to cause uncertainty about the company’s future, thus making for an investment risk, says Douglas Kee of Leon Frazer & Associates.

Since its IPO in November of 2015, Hydro One has seen its share of ups and downs, mostly downs at this point. Currently trading at $19.87, the stock has lost 11 per cent of its value in 2018 and 12 per cent over the last 12 months.

This year has been a turbulent one, to say the least, as newly elected Ontario premier Doug Ford…

READ MORE
texas grid improvements

5 ways Texas can improve electricity reliability and save our economy

READ MORE

Seamus Oregan

Affordable, safe' nuclear power is key to reaching Canada's climate goals: federal minister

READ MORE

china-path-to-carbon-neutrality

China's Path to Carbon Neutrality

READ MORE

ottawa power lines

Lack of energy: Ottawa’s electricity consumption drops 10 per cent during pandemic

READ MORE