Critics slam lack of firm price for reactors
The concerns were raised when the provincial government confirmed the move – first reported in the Star – to refurbish the 20-year old Darlington plant, extending its life to about 2050, and to give the nearby Pickering plant $300 million in upgrades to keep it running another 10 years before closing.
"It helps ensure a stable, affordable, sustainable ongoing emission-free source of energy," Energy Minister Brad Duguid said of the announcement by Crown-owned Ontario Power Generation.
Details on costs will be finalized over the next few years following studies, he said.
But without cost estimates on the Darlington job, slated to begin in 2016, New Democrats questioned how the government knows it is the most cost-effective way to ensure long-term electricity supply.
"You don't make a multi-billion dollar decision based on a guess," said New Democrat energy critic Peter Tabuns (Toronto-Danforth).
"Either they're withholding numbers from the public or they're making a guess. In either case, that's indefensible."
The anti-nuclear group Greenpeace said it typically costs $1.5 billion to $2 billion to refurbish a nuclear reactor, so that could push the work on Darlington's four units to $8 billion or more, given that cost overruns are typical on such jobs.
Related News

Shell says electricity to meet 60 percent of China's energy use by 2060
SINGAPORE - China may triple electricity generation to supply 60 percent of the country's total energy under Beijing's carbon-neutral goal by 2060, up from the current 23 per cent, according to Royal Dutch Shell.
Shell is one of the largest global investors in China's energy sector, with business covering gas production, petrochemicals and a retail fuel network. A leading supplier of liquefied natural gas, it has recently expanded into low-carbon business such as hydrogen power and electric vehicle charging.
In a rare assessment of the country's energy sector by an international oil major, Shell said China needed to take quick action this…