Trump's Proposal to Control Ukraine's Nuclear Plants Sparks Controversy

trumps-proposal-to-control-ukraines-nuclear-plants-sparks-controversy

subscribe

KYIV -

In a recent phone call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, U.S. President Donald Trump proposed that the United States take control of Ukraine's nuclear power plants, including the Zaporizhzhia Nuclear Power Plant (ZNPP), which has been under Russian occupation since early in the war. Trump suggested that American ownership of these plants could be the best protection for their infrastructure and that the U.S. could assist in running them with its electricity and utility expertise.

Ukrainian Response

President Zelenskyy promptly addressed Trump's proposal, stating that while the conversation focused on the ZNPP, the issue of ownership was not discussed. He emphasized that all of Ukraine's nuclear power plants belong to the Ukrainian people and that any transfer of ownership would require parliamentary approval . Zelenskyy clarified that while the U.S. could invest in and help modernize the ZNPP, ownership would remain with Ukraine.

Security Concerns

The ZNPP, Europe's largest nuclear facility, has been non-operational since its occupation by Russian forces in 2022. The plant's location near active conflict zones raises significant safety risks, and its future remains uncertain. Ukrainian officials have expressed concerns about potential Russian provocations, such as explosions, if and when Ukraine attempts to regain control of the plant.

International Reactions

The proposal has elicited mixed reactions both within Ukraine and internationally. Some Ukrainian officials view it as an opportunistic move by the U.S. to gain control over critical infrastructure, while others see it as a potential avenue for modernization and investment. The international community remains divided on the issue, with some supporting Ukraine's sovereignty over its nuclear assets and others advocating for international cooperation to ensure the plant's safety and future operation.

President Trump's proposal to have the U.S. take control of Ukraine's nuclear power plants has sparked significant controversy. While the U.S. offers expertise and investment, Ukraine maintains that ownership of its nuclear assets is a matter of national sovereignty. The situation underscores the complex interplay between security, sovereignty, and international cooperation in conflict zones.

Related News

site c

B.C. Hydro doing good job managing billions in capital assets, says auditor

VICTORIA - A report by B.C.’s auditor-general says B.C. Hydro is doing a good job managing the province’s dams, generating stations and power lines.

Carol Bellringer says in the audit that B.C. Hydro’s assets are valued at more than $25 billion and even though some generating facilities are more than 85 years old they continue to operate near full-capacity.

The report says about 80 per cent of Hydro’s assets are dams, generators, power lines, poles, substations and transformers that are used to provide electrical service to B.C.

The audit says Hydro invested almost $2.5 billion to renew, repair or replace the assets it…

READ MORE

Seven small UK energy suppliers must pay renewables fees or risk losing licence

READ MORE

GE darlington worker

Canadian nuclear projects bring economic benefits

READ MORE

Quebec shatters record for electricity consumption once again

READ MORE

wind turbines

Wind power making gains as competitive source of electricity

READ MORE