Foreign reactor bids could cause $29M expense

OTTAWA, ONTARIO - The price tag for specialized nuclear consultants will be as much as $29 million if rivals of Atomic Energy of Canada Ltd. bid on Ontario's new reactor contract, documents show.

Canada's nuclear-safety watchdog lacks expertise in the type of light-water reactors made by AECL's competitors and would have to bring in specialists to review licence applications if competitors enter bids.

"It is estimated that there will be two applications with this design requiring outsourced technical expertise at an estimated cost of $29 million over five years," says a memo prepared by the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission.

Those applications would come from Areva of France and Westinghouse Electric of the U.S.

There are no light-water reactors in Canada – AECL makes Candu heavy-water reactors – so the commission never needed much expertise in the area, says another memo.

Commission spokesperson Aurèle Gervais said the $29 million would not be spent if no firm applies for a light-water reactor licence.

Related News

coal shovel

Tucson Electric Power plans to end use of coal-generated electricity by 2032

TUCSON - In a dramatic policy shift, Tucson Electric Power says it will stop using coal to generate electricity by 2032 and will increase renewable energy's share of its energy load to more than 70% by 2035.

As part of that change, the utility will stop buying electricity from its two units at its coal-fired Springerville Generating Station by 2032. The plant, TEP's biggest power source, provides about 35% of its energy.

The utility already had planned to start up two New Mexico wind farms and a solar storage plant in the Tucson area by next year. The new plan calls for…

READ MORE

Abengoa, Acciona to start work on 110MW Cerro Dominador CSP plant in Chile

READ MORE

vladimir putin inspects computer terminal

Russian hackers had 'hundreds of victims' as they infiltrated U.S. power grid

READ MORE

uk-to-end-coal-power-after-142-years

UK to End Coal Power After 142 Years

READ MORE

Smaller, cheaper, safer: Next-gen nuclear power, explained

READ MORE