Controversial incinerator deal signed


CSA Z462 Arc Flash Training – Electrical Safety Compliance Course

Our customized live online or in‑person group training can be delivered to your staff at your location.

  • Live Online
  • 6 hours Instructor-led
  • Group Training Available
Regular Price:
$249
Coupon Price:
$199
Reserve Your Seat Today

Durham Region Incinerator Contract sparks outrage as Covanta Energy deal advances after provincial environmental assessment; waste-to-energy plant in Clarington faces criticism over emissions, property values, truck traffic, and governance ahead of the incoming council.

 

In This Story

An approved Covanta waste-to-energy deal for a Clarington plant, now contested over emissions, traffic, and governance.

  • $260M Covanta contract signed without new council vote
  • Provincial EA approved; opponents cite environmental risks
  • Plant to process 140,000 tonnes of waste per year
  • York Region holds 20% stake; federal gas-tax funds used
  • Critics warn of emissions, traffic, and property value drops

 

The chair of Durham Region has signed a controversial contract to build the GTA’s first garbage incinerator in 20 years.

 

Roger Anderson told regional council of his move with a mass email, igniting furious and saddened reactions from opponents of the $260 million project with Covanta Energy Corp., even as other energy megaprojects have faced overruns.

Anderson has signing authority on the contract without having to go back to council for approval. Just recently, the provincial Environment Ministry approved the Clarington incinerator’s environmental assessment earlier this month.

Anderson could not be reached for comment.

Opponents call the project dangerous for the environment and overpriced, arguing it will drive down property values and increase truck traffic.

“I’m absolutely disgusted,” said outgoing Oshawa councillor Brian Nicholson. “I think it’s the worst mistake Durham Region has made since the region was formed in 1974.”

“I was in tears today,” said Bill Steele, who ran unsuccessfully for council in Oshawa in the recent election. “I have a granddaughter who’s 8. I was thinking of her future, the quality of the air. We don’t have the greatest air already.”

In his email, Anderson said the incinerator project has been studied extensively for years.

“I feel it is appropriate that the contract be signed especially after this council spent every day of the last four years on this file after the peer reviews by the region and by Clarington and after 18 months of provincial review which confirmed what regional council supported in June of 2009,” Anderson wrote.

Nicholson said the incoming council should have been allowed to study details of the deal before Anderson signed it.

“That’s an insult to democracy,” he said.

In his email, Anderson said he signed the agreement “after much deliberation with staff, with our partners in York Region, and with our legal advisers in the region and in Toronto.”

“As regional chair I take my position very seriously and I would hope you would all know that if this agreement did not meet the directions given to me and staff by regional council I would not have signed the agreement,” Anderson wrote.

The incoming council meets December 8, and critics of the controversial energy-from-waste plant argued Anderson should have held off on signing the deal until it could be studied and debated by the new council, as national emissions debates continued across Ottawa this fall.

After it’s sworn in, council’s first order of business is expected to be a vote on whether Anderson remains as regional chair.

Steele said he expects the meeting to be packed and furious.

He said the previous council only saw broad strokes of the contract before it was signed.

“That should have went back to council to be discussed,” Steele said.

York Region is a 20 per cent partner in the incinerator, which will handle 140,000 tonnes of trash a year, creating electric power in the process for local use.

It’s to be built in Clarington using federal gas-tax funding, as Ontario seeks to keep emissions credits in play.

Steele said the only alternative now to stop the incinerator is for council to pay whatever penalties might be imposed and look at other technologies for managing trash.

“At any cost, I think we should stop that incinerator,” Steele said. “Whatever the cost is, pay and get out of it.”

In an online poll this fall, about half the 28 regional councillors said they wanted to stop the project, reflecting wider efficiency pushes like the old-style light bulb ban proposal in Ontario.

 

Related News

Related News

US January power generation jumps 9.3% on year: EIA

US January power generation climbed to 373.2 TWh, EIA data shows, with coal edging natural…
View more

Modular nuclear reactors a 'long shot' worth studying, says Yukon gov't

Yukon SMR Feasibility Study examines small modular reactors as low-emissions nuclear power for Yukon's grid…
View more

Climate change: Electrical industry's 'dirty secret' boosts warming

Sulphur Hexafluoride (SF6) Emissions drive rising greenhouse gas impacts in electrical switchgear, power grids, and…
View more

Quebec and other provinces heading toward electricity shortage: report

Canada Electricity Shortage threatens renewable energy transition as EV adoption and building decarbonization surge; Hydro-Quebec…
View more

The Collapse of Electric Airplane Startup Eviation

Eviation Collapse underscores electric aviation headwinds, from Alice aircraft battery limits to FAA/EASA certification hurdles,…
View more

German renewables deliver more electricity than coal and nuclear power for the first time

Germany renewable energy milestone 2019 saw wind, solar, hydropower, and biomass outproduce coal and nuclear,…
View more

Sign Up for Electricity Forum’s Newsletter

Stay informed with our FREE Newsletter — get the latest news, breakthrough technologies, and expert insights, delivered straight to your inbox.

Electricity Today T&D Magazine Subscribe for FREE

Stay informed with the latest T&D policies and technologies.
  • Timely insights from industry experts
  • Practical solutions T&D engineers
  • Free access to every issue

Live Online & In-person Group Training

Advantages To Instructor-Led Training – Instructor-Led Course, Customized Training, Multiple Locations, Economical, CEU Credits, Course Discounts.

Request For Quotation

Whether you would prefer Live Online or In-Person instruction, our electrical training courses can be tailored to meet your company's specific requirements and delivered to your employees in one location or at various locations.