Proposed Idaho nuclear plant suffers setback
The Elmore County Planning and Zoning Commission voted 4-2 against rezoning the land where Alternate Energy Holdings wants to build a 1,600-megawatt nuclear power plant.
The proposed plant is not in line with the county's 2004 comprehensive plan, said Alan Sobtzak, a commission member.
The application, which asks that the land be rezoned from agricultural to heavy industrial, will next be considered by county commissioners.
Don Gillispie, president of Alternate Energy Holdings, said in a statement that the company may start considering locations in Colorado or Mexico if the Idaho application is rejected.
He questioned why county officials recommended against rezoning the land.
"We find this puzzling as other forms of heavy industrial electrical generation, such as wind farms, solar plants and natural gas facilities, are given preferential treatment for siting under the county's comprehensive plan," Gillispie said. "These sources ironically consume much more ag land and/or are only niche energy, not to mention high-cost sources doing nothing for Idaho's base load power shortage needed to attract new businesses and much needed jobs."
The Snake River Alliance, a nuclear watchdog group based in Boise, praised the planning and zoning commission's decision.
"This is a huge victory for the people of Elmore County who spoke so eloquently and forcefully to defend Elmore County from this outlandish nuclear reactor scheme," said Andrea Shipley, the group's executive director. "We congratulate them for their passionate defense of their cherished way of life and the land and water that is so vital to these communities and to all of Idaho."
Related News

Opinion: The awesome, revolutionary electric-car revolution that doesn't actually exist
TORONTO - Something strange happened at the Ecofiscal Commission recently. Earlier this month, the carbon-tax advocacy group featured on its website as one of its advisers the renowned Canadian economist (and FP Comment columnist) Jack M. Mintz. The other day, suddenly and without fanfare, Mintz was gone from the website, and the commission’s advisory board.
Advisers come and advisers go, of course, but it turns out there was an impetus for Mintz’s departure. The Ecofiscal Commission in its latest report, dropped just before Canada Day, seemingly shifted from its position that carbon prices were so excellent at mimicking market forces…