Environmentalists Head for the States

subscribe

WASHINGTON — Maryland's traffic lights will soon use less electricity, though they will shine just as brightly. Commercial refrigerators and freezers will do their work with less power, and commercial washing machines will save water, as well as electricity, under a law setting higher efficiency standards for new equipment. In all, Maryland expects a 2 percent reduction in its electricity consumption by 2010.

These changes will come about not because of anything Washington has done, but through a law passed by the Maryland Legislature. And environmentalists plan to introduce the same bill in about a dozen more states this year.

The states may be taking the lead on electricity usage standards, just as they did on car and truck pollution in the 1980's and 1990's, and as they soon may on power-plant pollution.

"Show me a good federal standard, and I'll show you three or four states that did it first," said Rob Sargent, a spokesman for the National Association of State Public Interest Research Groups. "State policy kind of raises the bar."

California began the regulatory charge with a 1974 law, signed by then Gov. Ronald Reagan, mandating energy efficiency standards for a number of appliances. In 1987, as president, he signed the first federal law covering refrigerators and other appliances.

States have long been considered "policy laboratories," but the reason that they often lead the way in the closely linked areas of energy and pollution, experts say, is because the federal government moves so slowly. For example, the energy bill that President Bush wants to sign includes new efficiency standards. But the legislation is so packed with other provisions that it is now stalled in Congress.

In contrast, as environmentalists press this year for new electricity efficiency standards in New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Georgia, Florida, Illinois and all the states in New England, they are confident, at least, that their efforts won't be derailed by, say, a fight in Congress over giving new subsidies for nuclear power production.

Working through the states also lets environmentalists pick those states where saving energy has the greatest impact, said Isaac R. Elnecave of the Northeast Energy Efficiency Partnership, a nonprofit group in Lexington, Mass.

Mr. Elnecave said that electricity is much more expensive in Massachusetts than Arizona. For that reason, he said, everyone, politicians included, are likely to give improving energy efficiency greater priority.

"When you don't use a kilowatt-hour of electricity, that's 10 cents in Massachusetts, and 5 cents in Arizona," Mr. Elnecave said.

Finally, advocates say, the state-by-state approach sidesteps the Washington problem of a regulatory law that has been passed, but still needs written regulations for it to go into effect.

A 1992 law, for example, required the Energy Department to issue new efficiency standards for home furnaces, but this has not been carried out. The law also required new standards for central air-conditioners, but those standards weren't issued until about three years ago, and are not scheduled to take effect until 2006.

In fact, the Bush administration tried to introduce new, weaker standards but was defeated by a lawsuit brought by environmentalists and 10 states.

"In an ideal world, you want national standards," said Kit Kennedy, a lawyer with the Natural Resources Defense Council, which was instrumental in bringing the air-conditioner suit.

"In an ideal world," she added, "the Department of Energy is doing its job, setting standards and keeping up with schedules. But in the world we live in, the Department of Energy is sitting on its hands."

David K. Garman, assistant secretary of energy for energy efficiency and renewable energy, said that Congress gave the Energy Department complicated instructions. It laid out seven criteria for new standards, and the first is not energy, but the effect on manufacturers and consumers.

"If the law told us to act based on energy savings alone, it would be an easy job," he said.

Related News

Kakrapar nuclear plant

India’s Kakrapur 3 achieves criticality

DELHI - Unit 3 of India’s Kakrapar nuclear plant in Gujarat achieved criticality on 22 July. It is India’s first indigenously designed 700MWe pressurised heavy water reactor (PHWR) to achieve this milestone.

Prime Minister Narendra Modi congratulated nuclear scientists, saying the reactor is a shining example of the 'Make in India' campaign and a trailblazer for many such future achievements. 

India developed its own nuclear power generation technology as it faced sanctions from the international community following its first nuclear weapons test in in 1974. It has not signed the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. India has developed a three-stage nuclear programme based on…

READ MORE
nuclear plant

Can Europe's atomic reactors bridge the gap to an emissions-free future?

READ MORE

Iceland Cryptocurrency mining uses so much energy, electricity may run out

READ MORE

coal pile

New England Emergency fuel stock to cost millions

READ MORE

california wild fire

California Utility Cuts Power to Massive Areas in Northern, Central California

READ MORE