FERC relieves BPA of reactive power compensation obligations
Generators supply reactive power to the grid to maintain acceptable voltage levels for the transmission system, but in an order issued recently, FERC said BPA is well within its rights under Order 2003 to eliminate reactive-power compensation for the IPPs because it has proposed to eliminate that compensation for its affiliates as well.
In late May, BPA proposed to cease compensation for all generators for reactive power supplied within the so-called deadband. BPA is required, however, to pay all generators for reactive power outside the deadband.
The proposal falls squarely under the commission's comparability standard, FERC said.
"The commission's policy is not new; we confirmed it in Order No. 2003 - an interconnection generator 'should not be compensated for reactive power when operating its generating facility within the established power factor range, since it is only meeting its obligation,'" FERC said.
"As we stated recently, 'the commission's policy is that where a transmission provider does not separately compensate its own or affiliated generators for reactive power service within the deadband, it need not separately compensate non-affiliated generators for reactive power service within the deadband," the commission added.
Related News

Will Israeli power supply competition bring cheaper electricity?
TEL AVIV - "See the pseudo-reform in the electricity sector: no lower prices, no opening the market to competition, and no choice of electricity suppliers, with a high rate for consumers despite natural gas." This is an advertisement by the Private Power Producers Forum that is appearing everywhere: Facebook, the Internet, billboards, and the press.
Is it possible that the biggest reform in the economy with a cost estimated by Israel Electric Corporation (IEC) (TASE: ELEC.B22) at NIS 7 billion is really a pseudo-reform? In contrast to the assertions by the private electricity producers, who are supposedly worried about our wallets…