Group against Highwood plant challenges corps


CSA Z462 Arc Flash Training – Electrical Safety Compliance Course

Our customized live online or in‑person group training can be delivered to your staff at your location.

  • Live Online
  • 6 hours Instructor-led
  • Group Training Available
Regular Price:
$249
Coupon Price:
$199
Reserve Your Seat Today
Historic-preservation advocates say the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers did not conduct an essential review before earth moving began for a proposed power plant near the site of the Lewis and Clark expedition's milestone portage of 1805.

The corps did not meet a legal requirement that federal agencies consider how their actions will affect historic properties, the nonprofit National Trust for Historic Preservation wrote in a letter to Col. David C. Press, the corps' district commander in Omaha, Neb.

With earth moving having begun, it is harder to consider ways in which the Highwood Generating Station could be modified to avoid, minimize and mitigate harm to historic property, the National Trust said.

The site for the coal-fired Highwood project includes part of the Great Falls Portage National Historic Landmark, which encompasses the place where the Lewis and Clark expedition left the Missouri River in 1805 and made a 31-day portage around the river's Great Falls.

Maintaining that the power plant threatens irreparable harm, the National Trust put Great Falls Portage on the organization's 2008 list of America's 11 Most Endangered Places.

A spokesman for the corps, which is one of the entities from which Highwood developers must have permits, declined to comment on the letter to Press. The colonel had not received the letter and commenting would be premature, spokesman Kevin Quinn said.

The letter includes a call for the corps to demand that all onsite work related to the Highwood project stop, and that there be no further work on the ground before a review considering historic resources is complete. The letter was dated four days before construction work at the Highwood site ceased, following word from the Montana Department of Environmental Quality that the work had begun too soon. It was not to have started before an air-quality permit for the plant became final, DEQ's Bob Gallagher said.

In another effort against the plant, four conservation groups say Highwood's emission controls would be inadequate to protect public health from fine particulate and hazardous pollutants, including mercury, and therefore the air-quality permit should be invalidated. Citizens for Clean Energy, the Sierra Club, the Montana Environmental Information Center and the National Parks Conservation Association submitted an appeal to the Montana Board of Environmental Review, the Great Falls Tribune reported.

Lawsuits clouding Highwood include one over rezoning of the site.

The Highwood groundbreaking occurred Oct. 15 as developer Southern Montana Electric and Generation Cooperative tried to meet a Nov. 30 regulatory deadline for progress on preliminary construction.

Chief executive Tim Gregori did not immediately return a call about the status of the work and about complaints by the National Trust.

A July 11 letter from the corps prohibited certain aspects of work on the Highwood project but "clearly suggests by implication that other work on the project may proceed, including bulldozing" within a historic landmark, the National Trust wrote.

Although the Great Falls Portage National Historic Landmark is not totally undeveloped, "it absolutely maintains the general setting that was there" in the time of the Lewis and Clark expedition, Amy Cole, a lawyer for the National Trust in Denver, said. There are power lines, agricultural buildings and farming, but "it is not an industrial place right now," Cole said. "It will be after this plant is built, if that happens."

Cole said maps she has seen in connection with the Highwood project are largely conceptual and she does not know how much of the national landmark is in the Highwood site.

Related News

Carbon emissions fall as electricity producers move away from coal

Global Electricity Emissions Decline highlights a 2% drop as coal power falls, while wind and…
View more

Ukraine fights to keep the lights on as Russia hammers power plants

Ukraine Power Grid Attacks disrupt critical infrastructure as missiles and drones strike power plants, substations,…
View more

For Hydro-Québec, selling to the United States means reinventing itself

Hydro-Quebec hydropower exports deliver low-carbon electricity to New England, sparking debate on greenhouse gas accounting,…
View more

Mike Sangster to Headline Invest in African Energy Forum

TotalEnergies Africa Energy Strategy 2025 spotlights oil, gas, LNG, and renewables, with investments in Namibia,…
View more

Global CO2 emissions 'flatlined' in 2019, says IEA

2019 Global CO2 Emissions stayed flat, IEA reports, as renewable energy growth, wind and solar…
View more

Electricity prices in Germany nearly doubled in a year

Germany Energy Price Hikes are driving electricity tariffs, gas prices, and heating costs higher as…
View more

Sign Up for Electricity Forum’s Newsletter

Stay informed with our FREE Newsletter — get the latest news, breakthrough technologies, and expert insights, delivered straight to your inbox.

Electricity Today T&D Magazine Subscribe for FREE

Stay informed with the latest T&D policies and technologies.
  • Timely insights from industry experts
  • Practical solutions T&D engineers
  • Free access to every issue

Live Online & In-person Group Training

Advantages To Instructor-Led Training – Instructor-Led Course, Customized Training, Multiple Locations, Economical, CEU Credits, Course Discounts.

Request For Quotation

Whether you would prefer Live Online or In-Person instruction, our electrical training courses can be tailored to meet your company's specific requirements and delivered to your employees in one location or at various locations.