Nanticoke offers to host Oakville power plant


CSA Z462 Arc Flash Training – Electrical Safety Compliance Course

Our customized live online or in‑person group training can be delivered to your staff at your location.

  • Live Online
  • 6 hours Instructor-led
  • Group Training Available
Regular Price:
$249
Coupon Price:
$199
Reserve Your Seat Today

Nanticoke gas plant proposal faces Ontario energy scrutiny, balancing Haldimand County support with OPA cost concerns, Oakville peaker plant alternatives, new transmission lines, gas pipeline expenses, grid reliability, and coal phase-out goals near GTA.

 

The Important Points

An option to site a natural gas plant in Haldimand County, weighed against costs, grid losses, and GTA demand needs.

  • Haldimand County offers 3 km buffer and 4,500 acres
  • OPA flags $150M gas line and $200M transmission costs
  • Oakville peaker alternative operates only at peak demand
  • Longer runs at Nanticoke raise line losses and emissions

 

Haldimand County mayor says it has the will and the means to take on unwanted project The mayors of Haldimand County and Oakville are asking the province to consider moving a natural-gas-fired power plant planned for Oakville out of the GTA.

 

Mayor Marie Trainer of Haldimand County says her community is more than willing to accept the proposed plant in Nanticoke, where a nuclear plant idea has also been floated locally.

“We have the space, we have the lines, and we want it,” said Trainer. “Why put it near schools and subdivisions and senior homes? Bring it out to Haldimand County, where we have a three-kilometer buffer zone from residential areas around 4,500 acres of available land,” she said at a news conference.

The new plant would help buffer the economic fallout in 2015, after a plant closure report raised alarms about Nanticoke’s coal-fire generating station being shut down, Trainer said.

Minister of Energy and Infrastructure Brad Duguid says the province is open to all options, including earlier nuclear site promotion for Nanticoke. “We take the suggestions seriously and we welcome them,” he said, without elaborating on whether it’s a proposal the province is willing to consider.

But the Ontario Power Authority says the proposal is not a cost-effective way to meet the energy needs of the southwestern GTA.

“It would require a new gas line to be built, which would cost $150 million, and additional transmission lines at $200 million,” said Kristin Jenkins, director of media relations.

A plant in Nanticoke would also be required to run for longer stretches, as opposed to the “peaker plant” proposed for Oakville, which would operate only during periods of high demand. The extra distance also means more energy lost through power lines.

Plans to build the plant in Oakville near schools, homes and a hospital have been mired in controversy amid natural gas plant opposition since the site adjacent to the town’s Ford plant was chosen from four proposed sites in Mississauga and Oakville. Similar concerns have been seen in other areas where power plants are already under construction.

But the province says it’s a step that must be taken to meet energy demand as it attempts to replace dirty coal-fired generating stations with greener ones closer to the areas of need within the next few years. The province aims to shut down the rest of its coal-fired plants, including the huge Nanticoke station on Lake Erie, by 2014.

 

Related News

Related News

Electricity and water do mix: How electric ships are clearing the air on the B.C. coast

Hybrid Electric Ships leverage marine batteries, LNG engines, and clean propulsion to cut emissions in…
View more

California scorns fossil fuel but can't keep the lights on without it

California fossil fuel grid reliability plan addresses heat wave demand, rolling blackouts, and grid stability…
View more

PG&E pleads guilty to 85 counts in 2018 Camp Fire

PG&E Camp Fire Guilty Plea underscores involuntary manslaughter charges as the utility admits sparking Paradise's…
View more

Investor: Hydro One has too many unknowns to be a good investment

Hydro One investment risk reflects Ontario government influence, board shakeup, Avista acquisition uncertainty, regulatory hearings,…
View more

California’s Solar Power Cost Shift: A Misguided Policy Threatening Energy Equity

California Rooftop Solar Cost Shift examines PG&E rate hikes, net metering changes, and utility infrastructure…
View more

Wind and Solar Double Global Share of Electricity in Five Years

Wind And Solar Energy Growth is reshaping the global power mix, accelerating grid decarbonization as…
View more

Sign Up for Electricity Forum’s Newsletter

Stay informed with our FREE Newsletter — get the latest news, breakthrough technologies, and expert insights, delivered straight to your inbox.

Electricity Today T&D Magazine Subscribe for FREE

Stay informed with the latest T&D policies and technologies.
  • Timely insights from industry experts
  • Practical solutions T&D engineers
  • Free access to every issue

Live Online & In-person Group Training

Advantages To Instructor-Led Training – Instructor-Led Course, Customized Training, Multiple Locations, Economical, CEU Credits, Course Discounts.

Request For Quotation

Whether you would prefer Live Online or In-Person instruction, our electrical training courses can be tailored to meet your company's specific requirements and delivered to your employees in one location or at various locations.