NFPA 70E Training
Our customized live online or in‑person group training can be delivered to your staff at your location.
- Live Online
- 6 hours Instructor-led
- Group Training Available
Nanticoke gas plant proposal faces Ontario energy scrutiny, balancing Haldimand County support with OPA cost concerns, Oakville peaker plant alternatives, new transmission lines, gas pipeline expenses, grid reliability, and coal phase-out goals near GTA.
The Important Points
An option to site a natural gas plant in Haldimand County, weighed against costs, grid losses, and GTA demand needs.
- Haldimand County offers 3 km buffer and 4,500 acres
- OPA flags $150M gas line and $200M transmission costs
- Oakville peaker alternative operates only at peak demand
- Longer runs at Nanticoke raise line losses and emissions
Haldimand County mayor says it has the will and the means to take on unwanted project The mayors of Haldimand County and Oakville are asking the province to consider moving a natural-gas-fired power plant planned for Oakville out of the GTA.
Mayor Marie Trainer of Haldimand County says her community is more than willing to accept the proposed plant in Nanticoke, where a nuclear plant idea has also been floated locally.
“We have the space, we have the lines, and we want it,” said Trainer. “Why put it near schools and subdivisions and senior homes? Bring it out to Haldimand County, where we have a three-kilometer buffer zone from residential areas around 4,500 acres of available land,” she said at a news conference.
The new plant would help buffer the economic fallout in 2015, after a plant closure report raised alarms about Nanticoke’s coal-fire generating station being shut down, Trainer said.
Minister of Energy and Infrastructure Brad Duguid says the province is open to all options, including earlier nuclear site promotion for Nanticoke. “We take the suggestions seriously and we welcome them,” he said, without elaborating on whether it’s a proposal the province is willing to consider.
But the Ontario Power Authority says the proposal is not a cost-effective way to meet the energy needs of the southwestern GTA.
“It would require a new gas line to be built, which would cost $150 million, and additional transmission lines at $200 million,” said Kristin Jenkins, director of media relations.
A plant in Nanticoke would also be required to run for longer stretches, as opposed to the “peaker plant” proposed for Oakville, which would operate only during periods of high demand. The extra distance also means more energy lost through power lines.
Plans to build the plant in Oakville near schools, homes and a hospital have been mired in controversy amid natural gas plant opposition since the site adjacent to the town’s Ford plant was chosen from four proposed sites in Mississauga and Oakville. Similar concerns have been seen in other areas where power plants are already under construction.
But the province says it’s a step that must be taken to meet energy demand as it attempts to replace dirty coal-fired generating stations with greener ones closer to the areas of need within the next few years. The province aims to shut down the rest of its coal-fired plants, including the huge Nanticoke station on Lake Erie, by 2014.
Related News
Related News
Ontario Launches Peak Perks Program
UK Lockdown knocks daily electricity demand by 10 per cent
N.L., Ottawa agree to shield ratepayers from Muskrat Falls cost overruns
Some old dams are being given a new power: generating clean electricity
Learn how fees and usage impacts your electricity bill in new online CER tool
GM president: Electric cars won't go mainstream until we fix these problems
Sign Up for Electricity Forum’s Newsletter
Stay informed with our FREE Newsletter — get the latest news, breakthrough technologies, and expert insights, delivered straight to your inbox.
Electricity Today T&D Magazine Subscribe for FREE
- Timely insights from industry experts
- Practical solutions T&D engineers
- Free access to every issue