NRC seeks input on new nuclear design


NFPA 70b Training - Electrical Maintenance

Our customized live online or in‑person group training can be delivered to your staff at your location.

  • Live Online
  • 12 hours Instructor-led
  • Group Training Available
Regular Price:
$699
Coupon Price:
$599
Reserve Your Seat Today

ESBWR Certification advances GE-Hitachi's 1,594-MWe natural circulation reactor, as the NRC reviews passive safety features, Fukushima lessons, and U.S. new build applications, including AP1000, ABWR references, and DTE Energy's Michigan plans.

 

A Closer Look

NRC process validating GE-Hitachi's ESBWR safety, enabling utilities to reference the design in reactor license filings.

  • NRC targets late 2011 for ESBWR design decision
  • Passive safety: isolation condenser, gravity-driven cooling
  • Natural circulation, taller vessel, shorter core improve cooling
  • Post-Fukushima reviews influence U.S. reactor approvals
  • DTE Energy eyes ESBWR for a proposed Michigan plant

 

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission NRC said it was seeking public comment on the proposed certification of General Electric-Hitachi Nuclear Energy's Economic Simplified Boiling-Water Reactor ESBWR design for use in the United States.

 

This is just one step in a long certification process started in 2005, but it comes just weeks after an earthquake and tsunami seriously damaged the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant in Japan.

Following a radiation release at the plant in Japan, nations around the world, including the United States, started reviews of their existing and proposed new nuclear fleets to make sure the reactors are safe, and in some cases delays for new U.S. nuclear builds were being sought.

The NRC said it planned to make a final decision on the ESBWR design in late 2011. But a spokesman at the NRC could not say whether the events in Japan would change that schedule.

To date, the NRC has already certified four designs, three by Westinghouse — the System 80+, the Advanced Passive 600 AP600 and 1000 AP1000, and the General Electric Advanced Boiling Water Reactor ABWR.

The NRC is also expected to certify a modified version of the Westinghouse AP1000 in the autumn of 2011.

More than half of the applications for 26 new reactors already filed in the United States referenced the amended AP1000 design after earlier setbacks. Westinghouse is majority owned by Japan's Toshiba Corp and engineering firm Shaw Group Inc.

In a release, the NRC said the public had 75 days to comment on safety issues, among other things, for the proposed new ESBWR design.

After the NRC certifies a design, a utility applying with the NRC to build a new nuclear plant can reference that design and would therefore not need to submit safety information on the design as part of their application.

At least one company, DTE Energy Inc, has already told the NRC it wants to use the ESBWR design in a new reactor proposed for Michigan. DTE however has said it has not made a final decision to build the new reactor.

GE-Hitachi submitted an application for certification of the ESBWR with the NRC on August 24, 2005.

The ESBWR is a 1,594-megawatt electric, natural circulation reactor. It includes passive safety features that would cool the reactor after an accident without the need for human intervention.

The disabling of the cooling system at the Daiichi reactors was a big part of the problem in Japan since it allowed the reactor cores to heat up and partially melt the fuel, releasing hydrogen gas that resulted in explosions that damaged the reactor's outer buildings.

Some of the passive safety systems on the ESBWR include enhanced natural circulation via a taller reactor vessel, a shorter core and improved water flow through the vessel an isolation condenser system to control water levels and remove decay heat while the reactor is pressurized and a gravity-driven cooling system to maintain water levels when the reactor pressure drops.

Related News

IAEA Reviews Belarus’ Nuclear Power Infrastructure Development

Belarus Nuclear Power Infrastructure Review evaluates IAEA INIR Phase 3 readiness at Ostrovets NPP, VVER-1200…
View more

California’s Solar Power Cost Shift: A Misguided Policy Threatening Energy Equity

California Rooftop Solar Cost Shift examines PG&E rate hikes, net metering changes, and utility infrastructure…
View more

"Knowledge Gap" Is Contributing To On-the-job Electrical Injuries

BC Hydro Trades Electrical Safety addresses electric contact incidents among trade workers, emphasizing power line…
View more

Powering Towards Net Zero: The UK Grid's Transformation Challenge

UK Electricity Grid Investment underpins net zero, reinforcing transmission and distribution networks to integrate wind,…
View more

Georgia Power customers to see $21 reduction on June bills

Georgia Power June bill credit delivers PSC-approved savings, lower fuel rates, and COVID-19 relief for…
View more

Berlin Electric Utility Wins National Safety Award

Berlin Electric Utility APPA Safety Award recognizes Gold Designation performance in public power, highlighting OSHA-aligned…
View more

Sign Up for Electricity Forum’s Newsletter

Stay informed with our FREE Newsletter — get the latest news, breakthrough technologies, and expert insights, delivered straight to your inbox.

Electricity Today T&D Magazine Subscribe for FREE

Stay informed with the latest T&D policies and technologies.
  • Timely insights from industry experts
  • Practical solutions T&D engineers
  • Free access to every issue

Live Online & In-person Group Training

Advantages To Instructor-Led Training – Instructor-Led Course, Customized Training, Multiple Locations, Economical, CEU Credits, Course Discounts.

Request For Quotation

Whether you would prefer Live Online or In-Person instruction, our electrical training courses can be tailored to meet your company's specific requirements and delivered to your employees in one location or at various locations.