New regulations could cost coal plant $2.8B

subscribe

A proposed coal-fired power plant being built in southwestern Arkansas could end up paying $2.8 billion over 40 years because of new federal carbon penalties, a study by opponents claims.

New figures from the Southwestern Electric Power Co. put the cost of building the plant at about $2 billion, counting the costs of upgrading power lines and substations and obtaining an air permit. But opponents say a tougher stance by the Environmental Protection Agency on greenhouse gases will drive costs even higher for the project — which will be funded by ratepayers.

"The main thing that the utility was not willing to admit... was that the future costs of containing or controlling the (carbon dioxide) from this plant will be vastly greater than they ever anticipated or were willing to admit at the time," said Jim Metzger, the study's author, told reporters.

Metzger estimated the John W. Turk Jr. plant being built in Hempstead County would likely have to spend more than $163 million annually — or $2.8 billion over 40 years — just to contain or abate carbon dioxide emissions.

The 60-page study, done on behalf of the Sierra Club and Audubon Arkansas, comes after the EPA announced it was reviewing a Bush policy on new coal-fired power plants. The old policy prohibits using the federal permit process to require new coal-fired power plants to install equipment to reduce carbon dioxide.

Because of moves like that, at least 59 proposed coal-fired projects nationwide have been canceled or delayed, according to anti-coal groups.

SWEPCO officials dismissed the study as speculative.

"It's another delay tactic," SWEPCO spokesman Scott McCloud said. "All their purpose is, is to derail the Turk project."

Opponents are challenging an air permit for the plant granted by the state environmental regulators. Meanwhile, the utility asked the state for a $53.9 million rate increase Thursday, in part to cover financing costs for the power plant.

SWEPCO, based in Shreveport, La., is a subsidiary of Columbus, Ohio-based American Electric Power, among the largest electric utilities in the country.

Related News

trumps-proposal-on-ukraines-nuclear-plants-sparks-controversy

Trump's Proposal on Ukraine's Nuclear Plants Sparks Controversy

KYIV - In the midst of the ongoing conflict between Russia and Ukraine, U.S. President Donald Trump has proposed a controversial idea: Ukraine should give its nuclear power plants to the United States for safekeeping and management. This suggestion came during a phone call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, wherein Trump expressed the belief that American ownership of these nuclear plants could offer them the best protection amid the ongoing war. But Kyiv, while open to foreign support, has firmly rejected the idea of transferring ownership, especially as the Zaporizhzhia nuclear plant remains under Russian occupation.

Ukraine’s nuclear energy infrastructure…

READ MORE
ontario nuclear plant

Analysis: Why is Ontario’s electricity about to get dirtier?

READ MORE

ev-fires-raise-health-concerns-for-firefighters

EV Fires Raise Health Concerns for Firefighters

READ MORE

canada microgrid

Why Canada should invest in "macrogrids" for greener, more reliable electricity

READ MORE

Seamus Oregan

Affordable, safe' nuclear power is key to reaching Canada's climate goals: federal minister

READ MORE