West Virginia delays power line decision until 2011


NFPA 70E Training - 2027 Edition

Our customized live online or in‑person group training can be delivered to your staff at your location.

  • Live Online
  • 6 hours Instructor-led
  • Group Training Available
Regular Price:
$199
Coupon Price:
$149
Reserve Your Seat Today
The West Virginia Public Service Commission has denied a staff recommendation to dismiss an application for a multistate power line, saying it will instead delay a final decision on the three-state project until February 2011.

The decision comes as a Virginia Corporation Commission hearing examiner refused a similar request to dismiss the Potomac-Appalachian Transmission Highline, or PATH, application in that state. The hearing examiner ruled that PATH's application would be kept to the same decision-making timeline, but he would review the matter in January.

Allegheny Energy and partner American Electric Power have proposed building the 275-mile line from AEP's coal-fired John Amos plant in West Virginia, across parts of northern Virginia, to a substation near Kemptown, Maryland.

Staff lawyers for West Virginia's PSC sought to dismiss the application after Maryland's Public Service Commission dismissed PATH's application in September. Staff argued the Maryland decision meant the 765-kilovolt power line would have a starting point, but no ending point. Virginia Corporation Commission staff made a similar argument.

West Virginia staff also argued any decisions on the line should be delayed until electrical power need projections are updated in February.

In its order, the West Virginia PSC agreed a delay would give the commission more updated information to consider. It also would give PATH developers time to refile their application in Maryland.

The PSC said it will conduct hearings on the PATH's West Virginia application between October 18 and November 2, 2010.

Allegheny Energy spokesman Allen Staggers said the utility agrees with the West Virginia decision.

"That still works well with our schedule," he said.

Both utilities have argued that the line is necessary to ensure reliability of the mid-Atlantic region's electrical distribution system past 2014. The line was authorized in 2007 by PJM Interconnection, which manages the grid system for a 13-state region.

At least 250 groups, representing landowners, The Sierra Club, local county commissions and boards of education are opposed to PATH's construction.

Related News

Schneider Electric Aids in Notre Dame Restoration

Schneider Electric Notre Dame Restoration delivers energy management, automation, and modern electrical infrastructure, boosting safety,…
View more

Key Ontario power system staff may end up locked down at work sites due to COVID-19, operator says

Ontario IESO COVID-19 Control Room Measures detail how essential operators safeguard the electricity grid with…
View more

South Africa's Eskom could buy less power from wind farms during lockdown

Eskom Wind Power Curtailment reflects South Africa's lockdown-driven drop in electricity demand, prompting grid-balancing measures…
View more

Opinion: With deregulated electricity, no need to subsidize nuclear power

Pennsylvania Electricity Market Deregulation has driven competitive pricing, leveraged low-cost natural gas, and spurred private…
View more

National Steel Car appealing decision in legal challenge of Ontario electricity fee it calls an unconstitutional tax

Ontario Global Adjustment Appeal spotlights Ontario's electricity fee, regulatory charge vs tax debate, FIT contracts,…
View more

New England Is Burning the Most Oil for Electricity Since 2018

New England oil-fired generation surges as ISO New England manages a cold snap, dual-fuel switching,…
View more

Sign Up for Electricity Forum’s Newsletter

Stay informed with our FREE Newsletter — get the latest news, breakthrough technologies, and expert insights, delivered straight to your inbox.

Electricity Today T&D Magazine Subscribe for FREE

Stay informed with the latest T&D policies and technologies.
  • Timely insights from industry experts
  • Practical solutions T&D engineers
  • Free access to every issue

Live Online & In-person Group Training

Advantages To Instructor-Led Training – Instructor-Led Course, Customized Training, Multiple Locations, Economical, CEU Credits, Course Discounts.

Request For Quotation

Whether you would prefer Live Online or In-Person instruction, our electrical training courses can be tailored to meet your company's specific requirements and delivered to your employees in one location or at various locations.