West Virginia delays power line decision until 2011


NFPA 70E Training - 2027 Edition

Our customized live online or in‑person group training can be delivered to your staff at your location.

  • Live Online
  • 6 hours Instructor-led
  • Group Training Available
Regular Price:
$199
Coupon Price:
$149
Reserve Your Seat Today
The West Virginia Public Service Commission has denied a staff recommendation to dismiss an application for a multistate power line, saying it will instead delay a final decision on the three-state project until February 2011.

The decision comes as a Virginia Corporation Commission hearing examiner refused a similar request to dismiss the Potomac-Appalachian Transmission Highline, or PATH, application in that state. The hearing examiner ruled that PATH's application would be kept to the same decision-making timeline, but he would review the matter in January.

Allegheny Energy and partner American Electric Power have proposed building the 275-mile line from AEP's coal-fired John Amos plant in West Virginia, across parts of northern Virginia, to a substation near Kemptown, Maryland.

Staff lawyers for West Virginia's PSC sought to dismiss the application after Maryland's Public Service Commission dismissed PATH's application in September. Staff argued the Maryland decision meant the 765-kilovolt power line would have a starting point, but no ending point. Virginia Corporation Commission staff made a similar argument.

West Virginia staff also argued any decisions on the line should be delayed until electrical power need projections are updated in February.

In its order, the West Virginia PSC agreed a delay would give the commission more updated information to consider. It also would give PATH developers time to refile their application in Maryland.

The PSC said it will conduct hearings on the PATH's West Virginia application between October 18 and November 2, 2010.

Allegheny Energy spokesman Allen Staggers said the utility agrees with the West Virginia decision.

"That still works well with our schedule," he said.

Both utilities have argued that the line is necessary to ensure reliability of the mid-Atlantic region's electrical distribution system past 2014. The line was authorized in 2007 by PJM Interconnection, which manages the grid system for a 13-state region.

At least 250 groups, representing landowners, The Sierra Club, local county commissions and boards of education are opposed to PATH's construction.

Related News

Ontario introduces new 'ultra-low' overnight hydro pricing

Ontario Ultra-Low Overnight Electricity Rates cut costs for shift workers and EV charging, with time-of-use…
View more

Seven small UK energy suppliers must pay renewables fees or risk losing licence

Ofgem Renewables Obligations drive supplier payments for renewables fees, feed-in tariffs, and renewable generation, with…
View more

Russia and Ukraine Accuse Each Other of Violating Energy Ceasefire

Russia-Ukraine Energy Ceasefire Violations escalate as U.S.-brokered truce frays, with drone strikes, shelling, and grid…
View more

Ontario plunging into energy storage as electricity supply crunch looms

Ontario Energy Storage Procurement accelerates grid flexibility as IESO seeks lithium batteries, pumped storage, compressed…
View more

Explainer: Europe gets ready to revamp its electricity market

EU Electricity Market Reform seeks to curb gas-driven volatility by expanding CfDs and PPAs, decoupling…
View more

Atlantic Canadians less charged up to buy electric vehicle than rest of Canada

Atlantic Canada EV adoption lags, a new poll finds, as fewer buyers consider electric vehicles…
View more

Sign Up for Electricity Forum’s Newsletter

Stay informed with our FREE Newsletter — get the latest news, breakthrough technologies, and expert insights, delivered straight to your inbox.

Electricity Today T&D Magazine Subscribe for FREE

Stay informed with the latest T&D policies and technologies.
  • Timely insights from industry experts
  • Practical solutions T&D engineers
  • Free access to every issue

Live Online & In-person Group Training

Advantages To Instructor-Led Training – Instructor-Led Course, Customized Training, Multiple Locations, Economical, CEU Credits, Course Discounts.

Request For Quotation

Whether you would prefer Live Online or In-Person instruction, our electrical training courses can be tailored to meet your company's specific requirements and delivered to your employees in one location or at various locations.