Carbon pricing key to coal pollution plan

- The key to developing technology to store coal plants' pollution underground is charging them for the carbon dioxide they release into the air, an administration task force says.

The experimental technique is aimed at reducing pollution blamed for contributing to global warming.

In the report, the task force says that without a price for carbon pollution, there is no framework for investing in the underground storage technology, known as carbon capture and storage — or CCS.

According to the report, coal-fired power plants are the largest contributor to U.S. greenhouse gas emissions, which is why the Obama administration is making a big push for "clean coal." The Energy Department is funding demonstration projects with $4 billion in federal funds, matched by more than $7 billion in private investments.

Senate Democrats were forced to shelve plans for climate legislation last month because they couldn't get enough Republicans to support it. The GOP assailed the bill as a "national energy tax" and jobs killer, arguing that the costs would be passed on to consumers in the form of higher electricity bills and fuel costs.

President Barack Obama created the task force in February, charging it with coming up with a plan to overcome barriers to widespread, cost-effective deployment of carbon storage technology within 10 years — with a goal of bringing five to 10 commercial demonstration projects online by 2016.

A big issue hanging over the developing technology is liability costs if something goes wrong. A sudden release of large amounts of carbon dioxide can kill by asphyxiation. In 1986, 1,700 people died when a cloud of carbon dioxide escaped from a volcanic lake in Cameroon.

The report offers several options to address the liability issue for carbon storage facilities: limits on claims an industry-financed trust fund to pay damages after a site is closed transfer of liability to the federal government following a site closure or maintaining the current legal framework.

Despite questions about the technology, the report says there are no insurmountable barriers. But early projects do face "first-of-a-kind technology risks" and high costs, the report says.

It calls on federal agencies to help by coming up with rules governing such projects.

The task force, led by the Environmental Protection Agency and the Energy Department, included input from 14 federal agencies, CCS experts and others.

Related News

power lines

How IRENA Study Will Resolve Philippines’ Electricity Crisis

MANILLA - The reason why IRENA made its study in the Philippines is because of the country’s demand for electricity is on a steady rise while the generating capacity lags behind. To provide households the electricity, the government is constrained to implement rolling blackouts in some regions. By 2030, the demand for electricity is projected to reach 30 million kilowatts as compared to 17 million kilowatts which is its current generating capacity.

One of the country’s biggest conglomerations, San Miguel Corporation is accountable for almost 20% of power output. It has power plants that has a 900,000-kW generation capacity. Another corporation…

READ MORE
canadian grid power lines

State-sponsored actors 'very likely' looking to attack electricity supply, says intelligence agency

READ MORE

ford assembly line

Let’s make post-COVID Canada a manufacturing hub again

READ MORE

lori clark

Power customers in British Columbia, Quebec have faced fees for refusing the installation of smart meters

READ MORE

sdg&e

As peak wildfire season nears, SDG&E completes work on microgrid in Ramona

READ MORE