Nuclear questions left unanswered

subscribe

What will keep the lights on in Ontario 10 years from now?

That question was left unanswered when the province announced it would spend $300 million to keep the Pickering nuclear station open for another decade before mothballing it.

There was no announcement on what will replace Pickering's aging Candu reactors and their 3,000 megawatts of power (about 10 per cent of Ontario's electricity capacity) after the station closes in 2020.

The provincial government wants to build two next-generation Candu reactors at its Darlington nuclear station. But the price tag on those reactors (a reported $26 billion) caused the government sticker shock, and the procurement process was suspended last June.

Environmentalists say not to worry, that a combination of renewable energy installations (wind, solar, etc.) and conservation programs will fill the power gap. But industrial power users are not counting on that. Nor should residential consumers.

While Ontario is aggressively pursuing both renewables and conservation, the province has also said repeatedly that new nuclear reactors will still be needed as the old ones are phased out. But Ontario wants the federal government to share the cost burden. That makes sense, given that Ottawa is the owner of Atomic Energy of Canada Ltd. (AECL), the Candu manufacturer. A sale of the new generation of reactors to Ontario is considered essential in order to maintain AECL as a going concern.

But the federal Conservatives seem uninterested in partnering with Ontario on the reactor project, for reasons either ideological (they don't like government-owned enterprises) or geographical (they are rooted in Alberta while AECL is based in Ontario). Instead, they have put AECL up for sale, and the reactor maker's future is now uncertain.

"We are still committed to building two new reactors and we are currently in discussion with AECL and the federal government," provincial Energy Minister Brad Duguid told reporters. "As you know the federal government decided to restructure AECL in the middle of our procurement process, which lent a complication to the discussions.Â… We are still determined to move forward, however."

That is the sound of a minister stickhandling around a difficult question. The suspicion is that Ontario Liberals think they can rag the puck on this question until after the next provincial election (in 2011).

The problem is that it takes at least 10 years from decision to completion of a new reactor, given both the engineering and regulatory hurdles involved. And the clock is ticking, loudly.

Related News

Clorox accelerates goal of achieving 100% renewable electricity in the U.S. and Canada to 2021

OAKLAND - The Clorox Company and a wholly owned subsidiary of Enel Green Power North America announced today the signing of a 12-year, 70 megawatt (MW) virtual power purchase agreement (VPPA) for the purchase of renewable energy beginning in 2021. Representing about half of Clorox's 100% renewable electricity goal in its operations in the U.S. and Canada, this agreement is expected to help Clorox accelerate achieving its goal in 2021, four years ahead of the company's original plan.

"Climate change and rising greenhouse gas emissions pose a real threat to the health of our planet and ultimately the long-term well-being of…

READ MORE

Germany turns its back on nuclear for good despite Europe's energy crisis

READ MORE

sheerness power plant

Alberta gives $40M to help workers transition from coal power jobs

READ MORE

texas power lines

Air Conditioning Related Power Usage Set To Create Power Shortages In Many States

READ MORE

new-era-for-churchill-falls

A New Era for Churchill Falls: Newfoundland and Labrador Secures Billions in Landmark Deal with Quebec

READ MORE