California's future with income-based flat-fee utility bills is getting closer

california power lines

SAN FRANCISCO -

Electricity bills in California are likely to change dramatically in 2026.

The California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) is in the midst of an unprecedented overhaul of the way most of the state’s residents pay for electricity.

Utility bills currently rely on a use-more pay-more system, where bills are directly tied to how much electricity a resident consumes.

California lawmakers are asking regulators to take a different approach. Some of the bill will pay for the kilowatt hours a customer uses and a monthly fixed fee will help pay for expenses to maintain the electric grid: the poles, the substations, the batteries, and the wires that bring power to people’s homes.

The adjustments to the state’s public utility code, section 739.9, came about because of changes written into a sweeping energy bill passed last summer, AB 205.

A stroke of a pen, a legislative vote, and the governor’s signature created a move toward unprecedented income-based utility fees.

“This was put in at the last minute,” said Ahmad Faruqui, a California economist with a long professional background in utility rates. “Nobody even knew it was happening. It was not debated on the floor of the assembly where it was supposedly passed. Of course, the governor signed it.”

Faruqui wonders who was responsible for legislation that was added to the energy bill during the budget writing process. That process is not transparent.

“It’s a very small clause in a very long bill, which is mostly about other issues,” Faruqui said.

But that small adjustment could have a massive impact on California residents, because it links the size of a monthly flat fee for utility service to a resident’s income. Earn more money and pay a higher flat fee.

That fee must be paid even before customers are charged for how much power they draw.

Regulators interpreted legislative change as a mandate, but Faruqui is not sold.

“They said the commission may consider or should consider,” Faruqui said. “They didn’t mandate it. It’s worth re-reading it.”

In fact, the legislative language says the commission “may” adopt income-based flat fees for utilities. It does not say the commission “should” adopt them.

Nevertheless, the CPUC has already requested and received nine proposals for how a flat fee should be implemented.

The suggestions came from consumer groups, environmentalists, the solar industry and utilities.

Related News

ukraine-fights-to-keep-the-lights-on

Ukraine fights to keep the lights on as Russia hammers power plants

KYIV - Ukraine is facing an ongoing battle to maintain its electrical grid in the wake of relentless Russian attacks targeting power plants and energy infrastructure. These attacks, which have intensified in the last year, are part of Russia's broader strategy to weaken Ukraine's ability to function amid the ongoing war. Power plants, substations, and energy lines have become prime targets, with Russian forces using missiles and drones to destroy critical infrastructure, leaving millions of Ukrainians without electricity and heating during harsh winters.

The Ukrainian government and energy companies are working tirelessly to repair the damage and prevent total blackouts,…

READ MORE

Shopping for electricity is getting cheaper in Texas

READ MORE

canada-ambitious-electric-vehicle-goals

Canada's Ambitious Electric Vehicle Goals

READ MORE

bc hydro logo

B.C. residents and businesses get break on electricity bills for three months

READ MORE

electricity

Judge: Texas Power Plants Exempt from Providing Electricity in Emergencies

READ MORE