EPA to place limits on power plant water pollution

subscribe

For the first time in nearly 30 years, the Environmental Protection Agency plans to limit the quantity of toxic metals that coal-fired power plants release into waterways.

The agency said that equipment required to reduce pollution in the air has increased harmful contaminants in water discharged by power plants, particularly heavy metals such as selenium, cadmium, mercury and lead. Current regulations do nothing to control metals and are not enough to protect water quality and wildlife, the agency said.

The agency said the new rules will be unveiled in 2012, but EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson is pushing for an earlier target date.

In a preliminary study released last year, the EPA found that only a fraction of the nation's power plants were using readily available technologies to remove pollutants before they are released into waterways. The water pollution comes from scrubbers that strip gases of acid-raining causing sulfur dioxide and coal ash storage ponds where power plants store the leftovers of burning coal.

A spill at a coal ash pond in Tennessee late last year, which flooded hundreds of acres of land, damaged homes and killed fish in nearby rivers, helped raise awareness about the toxic contents of coal combustion waste and has put increasing pressure on the government to take action.

The announcement comes a day after three environmental groups threatened to sue the EPA for failing to update its regulations, first put in place in 1982. Federal law requires the agency to review regulations annually and revise them if necessary, which the advocates say the agency failed to do.

"EPA should have limited these discharges decades ago as the law requires," said Eric Schaeffer, the executive director of the Environmental Integrity Project, which along with the Sierra Club and Defenders of Wildlife, informed the EPA of its plans to file a lawsuit.

Representatives of those groups said they still planned to pursue the case, and pressed EPA to set a firm deadline for the new rules.

But Scott Segal, director of the Electric Reliability Coordinating Council, a coalition of power companies, urged EPA to take its time. He also said the agency is obligated to consider the cost of any new regulations.

"The power sector is already heavily regulated," Segal said. "Failure to adequately consider cost hurts consumers."

Related News

Electric vehicles to transform the aftermarket … eventually

GRAPEVINE, Texas - Those who sell parts and repair trucks might feel uneasy when reports emerge about a coming generation of electric trucks.

There are reportedly about 33% fewer parts to consider when internal combustion engines and transmissions are replaced by electric motors. Features such as regenerative braking are expected to dramatically reduce brake wear. As for many of the fluids needed to keep components moving? They can remain in their tanks and drums.

Think of them as disruptors. But presenters during the annual Heavy Duty Aftermarket Dialogue are stressing that the changes are not coming overnight. Chris Patterson, a consultant and…

READ MORE

Quebec and other provinces heading toward electricity shortage: report

READ MORE

meeting in halifax

Canada to spend $2M on study to improve Atlantic region's electricity grid

READ MORE

doe logo

U.S. Announces $28 Million To Advance And Deploy Hydropower Technology

READ MORE

Egypt’s Electricity Minister Mohamed Shaker

Egypt Plans Power Link to Saudis in $1.6 Billion Project

READ MORE