Faulty readers cause billing errors
At fault are 1 percent to 3 percent of the devices that take readings of WPSC's 700,000 meters, said spokeswoman Kelly Zagrzebski. The meters themselves are functioning properly and accurately recording energy use, she said.
The company uses reading devices from a number of vendors, and the problem doesn't appear to be isolated to a particular batch of equipment, Zagrzebski said.
Only those customers who were undercharged or overcharged will be notified, Zagrzebski said. Where a discrepancy is found, WPSC workers will check and test the meter. The company then will mail an additional bill or refund on the account.
"We understand that people are disappointed that they were back-billed, but they need to keep in mind that they used the power in the first place," said Zagrzebski, who stressed the Wisconsin Public Service Commission mandates the utility charge customers the full amount for their use.
Rhody Mallick of Kristin's At Middletown Food & Spirits in Stevens Point received a back-billing from WPSC. He was told from September 2005 to January 2007 he was undercharged about $700. He set up an 18-month payment plan to square the bill.
"I don't understand how they can say I used this much gas. How do they prove that? How do they know?" Mallick asked. "Business is tough enough the way it is, and then you get hit with an extra $700. It takes a bite out of you."
Mallick said he felt he had no choice but to pay the $700.
State Rep. Louis Molepske Jr., D-Stevens Point, said he can understand customers' frustration.
"The Public Service Commission has room to be more customer-friendly," he said. "Most people aren't sure where to turn when they have a problem. They just want to know their rates are fair and justified."
In January, the Public Service Commission approved a 6.6 percent rate increase for electricity and a 3.8 percent increase for gas for WPSC to expire at the end of the year. The Green Bay-based company, which serves northeastern and central Wisconsin and an adjacent portion of Upper Michigan, reported a $129 million profit last year.
Related News

Hydro One stock has too much political risk to recommend, Industrial Alliance says
TORONTO - A seemingly positive development for Hydro One is overshadowed by ongoing political and regulatory risk, Industrial Alliance Securities analyst Jeremy Rosenfield says.
On October 4, staff from the Washington Utilities and Transportation Commission filed updated testimony in support of the merger of Hydro One and natural gas distributor Avista.
The merger, which was announced in July of 2017 has received the green light from federal and key states, with Washington, Oregon and Idaho being exceptions.
But Rosenfield says even though decisions from Oregon and Idaho are expected by December, there are still too many unknowns about Hydro One to recommend investors…