Fukushima Nuclear Disaster Could Cost $257 Billion

Fukushima radioactive leaks and cleanup costs expose Japan's nuclear disaster risks, as TEPCO reports contaminated water reaching the Pacific Ocean, strontium and cesium detections, ballooning compensation, and recalls, underscoring long-term decontamination and waste storage challenges.

Nuclear power generated electricity may appear cheap, but like fossil fuel electricity generation much of the real cost is hidden in subsidies and other forms of support. Add to that a nuclear accident or even just other associated environmental impacts under normal operations and suddenly any savings quickly evaporate, like water on overheated nuclear fuel rods.

According to a report from Reuters, based on data from the Nikkei, it's been estimated cleaning up after the Fukushima nuclear disaster, with four reactors written off by TEPCO, and compensation costs could be as high as 20 trillion yen - USD$257 billion.

While the Fukushima crisis doesn't dominate the headlines as much any more, it's an ongoing situation with nasty events like another explosion regularly cropping up.

Just this week, there have been two developments of note.

Operators of the Fukushima plant, Tokyo Electric Power Co. TEPCO, announced on Monday 45 tonnes of highly radioactive waste water had leaked from the plants water treatment system.

Yesterday, TEPCO estimated 300 litres of the waste water ran into a nearby gutter that leads to the Pacific Ocean, with around 150 litres actually releasing low-level radiation into the ocean that day.

This morning, ABC News has reported radioactive caesium has been detected in a brand of Japanese baby formula sparking a recall of 400,000 cans.

Radioactive food, water and land - in fact, radioactive everything - aren't the only environmental hazards to be generated by the Fukushima nuclear disaster, where fuel rods likely melted early on.

As Australia continues its journey towards its wind and solar powered clean energy future, it's all food for thought as we strike agreements with countries such as India to supply uranium for power generation purposes amid a myth of nuclear safety that persists. Let's not forget the millions of tonnes of coal and other fossil fuels we export around the world each year either.

Can we every really lay claim to being clean and green by shipping the essential ingredients for major environmental disasters to other nations? Is Australia the Typhoid Mary of energy?

Related News

• Electricity Forum News

• Power Generation News