Is power rebate best use of $1 billion?

subscribe

If the provincial government has $1 billion available, is an across-the-board cut in everyone's electricity bill the best way to spend it? Probably not.

Yet that is what Finance Minister Dwight Duncan offered up in the Legislature in his annual fall economic statement. "Every little bit helps," said Duncan, as he announced a 10 per cent cut in electricity bills for the next five years, at a cost of more than $1 billion a year to the provincial treasury.

Also in the statement were a $1 billion windfall from the extension of the Teranet deal and legislation to regulate trading in derivatives. But the new electricity subsidy was clearly the highlight of the day.

This comes after the government has been insisting for months that Ontarians, having been sheltered by a succession of "irresponsible" governments that kept hydro rates artificially low, need to face up to the reality that electricity isn't cheap.

"We know that there are costs associated with investing heavily in the modernization of our electricity system," said Premier Dalton McGuinty just a few weeks ago. "But it's a plan that we absolutely need to move forward with so we have the reliability."

Apparently the government decided that this message was being swamped by public anger over rising electricity bills, so it opted to spend borrowed billions to hold prices down.

The opposition parties bear much of the blame for this. For months, they have been whipping up hysteria about electricity bills, while offering no credible solutions of their own for addressing Ontario's energy problems. They were still at it following the economic statement, with NDP Leader Andrea Horwath saying the hike in electricity bills was "off the Richter scale."

As for the Liberal government, it might have considered spending $1 billion-plus annually on restoring the cuts in funding for transit expansion in the Greater Toronto Area or on advancing its plans to reduce poverty. Both measures would have made more sense than giving the rich, poor and everyone in between an average $153.60 break in their annual electricity bills. But there wouldn't have been the same political bang for the buck.

Related News

Britain breaks record for coal-free power generation

Britain breaks record for coal-free power generation - but what does this mean for your energy bills?

LONDON - On Wednesday 10 June, Britain hit a significant landmark: the UK went for two full months without burning coal to generate power – that's the longest period since the 1880s.

According to the National Grid, Britain has now run its electricity network without burning coal since midnight on the 9 April. This coal-free period has beaten the country’s previous record of 18 days, six hours and 10 minutes, which was set in June 2019.

With such a shift in Britain’s drive for renewables and lower electricity demand following the coronavirus lockdown, now may be the perfect time to do an…

READ MORE

Why an energy crisis and $5 gas aren't spurring a green revolution

READ MORE

powerline workers

PG&E keeps nearly 60,000 Northern California customers in the dark to reduce wildfire risk

READ MORE

EIA expects solar and wind to be larger sources of U.S. electricity generation this summer

READ MORE

US Automakers Will Build 30,000 Electric Vehicle Chargers

READ MORE