Green schools program money well spent


CSA Z463 Electrical Maintenance -

Our customized live online or in‑person group training can be delivered to your staff at your location.

  • Live Online
  • 6 hours Instructor-led
  • Group Training Available
Regular Price:
$249
Coupon Price:
$199
Reserve Your Seat Today

Ontario MASH Energy Efficiency Fund, a proposed revolving loan program, finances deep retrofits across schools, hospitals, and municipalities, leveraging smart meters, lighting controls, and renewables to cut emissions and utility costs with rapid payback.

 

The Core Facts

Proposed $250M low-interest fund for deep retrofits in Ontario's MASH sector, repaid from energy savings.

  • $250M low-interest revolving loans for deep energy retrofits
  • Targets MASH sector: municipalities, academia, schools, hospitals
  • Paid back from savings; typical retrofits pay back within 2 years

 

That’s my initial impression of a government initiative that aims to equip more than 150 of the province’s schools with clean technologies from Ontario-based companies.

 

There are more than two dozen Ontario clean technology ventures participating in the program, which is being jointly spearheaded by the Ministry of Education and Ministry of Research and Innovation.

Oakville-based Fifth Light, which has a technology that reduces the electricity consumption of fluorescent lighting systems, is retrofitting eight schools.

Triacta Power Technologies of Ottawa is installing its smart meters in more than two-dozen schools. REGEN Energy and EnviroTower, both from Toronto, are also putting their energy-reducing products into schools.

On the renewable energy side, Ancaster-based Cleanfield Energy is installing its vertical axis wind turbines which kind of look like egg beaters on the school rooftops of at least nine schools. A number of solar projects are also in the works, based on home grown products from Arise Technologies, Menova Engineering and Conserval Engineering.

I say the $20 million is well spent because these projects are designed to demonstrate Ontario-based technologies that lack a solid track record of deployment. Without that track record, it’s tough for these companies to go out into the global marketplace and convince others to take a chance on their products, even as Canada is falling behind in the clean-tech race globally today.

But not every dollar devoted to “greening” our schools need be given away. Last April, for example, as part of a sustainable energy plan the McGuinty government earmarked $550 million for energy-reducing “renovations and retrofits” of schools.

A month later another $50 million was announced for renewable energy projects – solar, geothermal, micro-wind and other green power systems that generate electricity, heating or cooling.

I applauded the financial commitment at the time, and to an extent still do, including early pilots where two schools were to get solar panels, but looking back I wonder whether just throwing the money at schools was the right approach during a time when provincial budgets are under intense stress.

It’s well established that energy-efficiency retrofits offer the biggest emissions-reduction bang for the scarce public buck. Energy savings of between 15 per cent and 30 per cent can be achieved with proven and widely available technologies.

Sure, such retrofits can cost a lot up front, but compared to solar or geothermal, the payback is often less than two years – as opposed to a decade or longer, which shapes debates about the true cost of going green in Ontario today.

That being the case, why not just loan the money to schools and other public institutions, and then have these institutions pay back that loan – and maybe 2 or 3 per cent interest – from the energy savings that result?

What you end up with is a revolving fund, which is essentially the gift that keeps on giving. It’s an approach that Julia Langer, executive director of the Toronto Atmospheric Fund, is urging the government to embrace in a big way.

“Many measures pay back within months and can be blended with retrofits with longer paybacks for a reasonable return on investment,” Langer says.

She has proposed that the Ontario government create, to start, a $250-million low-interest revolving loan fund aimed at helping municipal governments, academic institutions, schools and hospitals – collectively known as the MASH sector—dig deep into energy efficiency.

By “deep” I mean beyond light bulbs. Some fruit hangs lower than others. Rather than cheap out by buying the short ladder, Langer wants us to spend a bit more on a longer ladder that gives us more reach but much bigger savings over time.

We know that the MASH sector represents roughly 10 per cent of Ontario’s greenhouse gas emissions. We also know that their energy costs are high, and Ontario schools can be leaders in efficiency when investments are sustained. School boards alone spent nearly half a billion dollars on their utility bills in 2009.

Langer figures that a $250 million fund can finance 75 or more retrofit projects over two years, and that over 10 years the fund’s total investment will be triple its original value.

Now, there are many different ways to finance this. Infrastructure Ontario can raise money by issuing green bonds. The Ministry of Finance can simply earmark funds in the budget. Or, the government can provide loan guarantees as a way to get the banks directly involved. A combination of the above is also an option.

Of course, this requires that government think creatively and take on more responsibility – not to mention the potential pitfalls that come with it. Nobody wants to see another e-health scandal or Ontario Lottery and Gaming Corp., and that’s a risk whenever government creates a structure to manage large sums of money.

It’s easier and more hassle-free to just spend the money in one shot. Unfortunately, it’s an approach and mindset that prevents us from doing more with less.

A $250-million revolving fund? Heck, I say go for $1 billion.

 

Related News

Related News

India’s Kakrapur 3 achieves criticality

Kakrapar Unit 3 700MWe PHWR achieved first criticality, showcasing indigenously designed nuclear power, NPCIL operations,…
View more

Solar Plus Battery Storage Cheaper Than Conventional Power in Germany

Germany Solar-Plus-Storage Cost Parity signals grid parity as solar power with battery storage undercuts conventional…
View more

IAEA reactor simulators get more use during Covid-19 lockdown

IAEA Nuclear Reactor Simulators enable virtual nuclear power plant training on IPWR/PWR systems, load-following operations,…
View more

"Energy war": Ukraine tries to protect electricity supply before winter

Ukraine Power Grid Resilience details preparations for winter blackouts, airstrike defense, decentralized generation, backup generators,…
View more

Trump's Oil Policies Spark Shift in Wall Street's Energy Strategy

Wall Street Fossil Fuel Pivot signals banks reassessing ESG, net-zero, and decarbonization goals, reviving oil,…
View more

Soaring Electricity And Coal Use Are Proving Once Again, Roger Pielke Jr's "Iron Law Of Climate"

Global Electricity Demand Surge underscores rising coal generation, lagging renewables deployment, and escalating emissions, as…
View more

Sign Up for Electricity Forum’s Newsletter

Stay informed with our FREE Newsletter — get the latest news, breakthrough technologies, and expert insights, delivered straight to your inbox.

Electricity Today T&D Magazine Subscribe for FREE

Stay informed with the latest T&D policies and technologies.
  • Timely insights from industry experts
  • Practical solutions T&D engineers
  • Free access to every issue

Live Online & In-person Group Training

Advantages To Instructor-Led Training – Instructor-Led Course, Customized Training, Multiple Locations, Economical, CEU Credits, Course Discounts.

Request For Quotation

Whether you would prefer Live Online or In-Person instruction, our electrical training courses can be tailored to meet your company's specific requirements and delivered to your employees in one location or at various locations.