UN panel to rule on ChinaÂ’s wind projects


NFPA 70E Training

Our customized live online or in‑person group training can be delivered to your staff at your location.

  • Live Online
  • 6 hours Instructor-led
  • Group Training Available
Regular Price:
$199
Coupon Price:
$149
Reserve Your Seat Today

CDM Review of Chinese Wind Projects examines additionality under the Kyoto Protocol, carbon offsets and CERs, UN board scrutiny of wind tariffs, emissions reductions, coal baselines, and market integrity in China's fast-growing power sector.

 

The Main Points

A UN-led check on whether Chinese wind farms earn additional CERs under Kyoto amid shifting tariffs and coal baselines.

  • UN board reviews 17 Chinese wind farms, 900+ MW capacity
  • Projects could yield 8 Mt CERs through 2012, worth €107m
  • Tariff cuts raise doubts about additionality and eligibility

 

Lobbyist pressure will not weigh on a UN panel's decision whether to award carbon finance worth about 100 million euros (US$144 million) to Chinese wind power projects, said the chair of the panel.

 

"If you add it all up there are quite a number of projects, all from China," Lex de Jonge told the Reuters Global Climate and Alternative Energy Summit, on a UN ruling on wind farm financing due soon.

The issue has caused long-running tension between the panel and project developers and brokers after a series of wind farm rejections over the speed of approvals in the $6.5 billion global carbon offset market.

Under the UN-led Kyoto Protocol's clean development mechanism, with some Kyoto profits in China raising questions, rich countries can buy rights to pollute by funding cuts in greenhouse gas emissions in developing nations.

The UN executive board in the past three months has decided to review if many new Chinese wind projects qualify, after noting a drop in financial support from Beijing.

The Kyoto scheme is supposed to fund additional cuts in emissions and, if projects are self sufficient, with some renewables powering ahead without the CDM in China, it may be that they are no longer cutting emissions below normal trends.

"We see a downward trend in (windpower price premium) tariffs in certain areas in China. Changing the tariff, as sectors aim to wean off subsidies over time, may have an impact on a final decision on whether a project is additional," he said at the summit held at the Reuters office in London.

The panel is reviewing 17 projects with a total capacity of more than 900 megawatts, enough to power about 1 million homes. The projects would produce through 2012 some 8 million tonnes of carbon offsets called certified emissions reductions (CERs), even as reducing emissions in Europe remains difficult, worth 107 million euros at today's prices.

Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) projects, which are favored in India by many developers, must prove either that the scheme allowed a project to overcome some barrier such as financial uncertainty, or that the project was not as financially attractive as an alternative such as coal power.

Market participants say the rules should be simpler — pointing out that in China electricity generation is dominated by high-carbon coal.

"The need to encourage the deployment of wind energy in countries like China, where energy needs are growing rampantly, is enormous," said the lobby group the International Emissions Trading Association in a letter to de Jonge last month.

China has recently firmed its support for the wind power sector in some regions with a premium tariff levied, complicating the issue of whether Chinese official support is indeed falling.

"I didn't count and I don't care," said de Jonge when asked how much the projects under review were worth. "That might sound strange but this is about safeguarding integrity of the CDM."

"With so much money involved, people have interests and if they don't see their interests followed they start complaining. I don't feel pressured about this. To me it's normal."

De Jonge said that some past "bashing" of the board had been justified, for example with regard to a lack of transparency, but added that waiting times were falling following new guidance.

Most criticism of the CDM now came from the United States, he said. "(American) NGOs and academics are critical toward the CDM... based on arguments that are no longer valid."

 

Related News

Related News

New Mexico Governor to Sign 100% Clean Electricity Bill ‘As Quickly As Possible’

New Mexico Energy Transition Act advances zero-carbon electricity, mandating public utilities deliver carbon-free electricity by…
View more

Warren Buffett-linked company to build $200M wind power farm in Alberta

Rattlesnake Ridge Wind Project delivers 117.6 MW in southeast Alberta for BHE Canada, a Berkshire…
View more

Sask. Party pledges 10% rebate on SaskPower electricity bills

SaskPower 10% Electricity Rebate promises one-year bill relief for households, farms, businesses, hospitals, schools, and…
View more

IAEA Reviews Belarus’ Nuclear Power Infrastructure Development

Belarus Nuclear Power Infrastructure Review evaluates IAEA INIR Phase 3 readiness at Ostrovets NPP, VVER-1200…
View more

Florida says no to $400M in federal solar energy incentives

Florida Solar for All Opt-Out highlights Gov. DeSantis rejecting EPA grant funds under the Inflation…
View more

US judge orders PG&E to use dividends to pay for efforts to reduce wildfire risks

PG&E dividend halt for wildfire mitigation directs cash from shareholders to tree clearing, wildfire risk…
View more

Sign Up for Electricity Forum’s Newsletter

Stay informed with our FREE Newsletter — get the latest news, breakthrough technologies, and expert insights, delivered straight to your inbox.

Electricity Today T&D Magazine Subscribe for FREE

Stay informed with the latest T&D policies and technologies.
  • Timely insights from industry experts
  • Practical solutions T&D engineers
  • Free access to every issue

Download the 2026 Electrical Training Catalog

Explore 50+ live, expert-led electrical training courses –

  • Interactive
  • Flexible
  • CEU-cerified