European insurance law changes threaten nuclear build
UNITED KINGDOM - The nuclear industry is in talks with the government to thrash out a solution to insurance problems that threaten to undermine plans to build at least eight new power stations by 2023.
The legal arm of the Nuclear Industry Association (NIA) is working with the Department for Business, Enterprise & Regulatory Reform to deal with changes to the law due next year that will increase nuclear power operators’ liability from about £140m to £500m.
A European protocol means the UK government must also extend the range of claims to such events as the effect on property prices of a nuclear accident.
Lawyers have warned that insurers are not prepared to underwrite the risk, and EU laws that stop governments giving financial aid to industries restrict the role the state can play.
David Gollancz, partner at law firm Field Fisher Waterhouse, is part of the NIA’s legal group. He said: “The current thinking is maybe the government can set up a quasi-insurance scheme to see new build get started.”
The insurance problems have coincided with the collapse of the sale of British Energy to French electricity firm EDF this week. The sale was seen as crucial to the governmentÂ’s plans as British Energy controls the likely sites of the new reactors.
Bill Harris, head of nuclear work at Turner & Townsend, called on the government to restore confidence after the collapse of the deal.
He said: “It needs to reassure the industry that it is still committed to the nuclear renaissance programme.”
Related News

Hydro One wants to spend another $6-million to redesign bills
TORONTO - Ontario's largest and recently privatized electricity utility has spent $9-million to redesign bills and is proposing to spend an additional $6-million on the project.
Hydro One has come under fire for spending since the Liberal government sold more than half of the company, notably for its CEO's $4.5-million pay.
Now, the NDP is raising concerns with the $15-million bill redesign expense contained in a rate application from the formerly public utility.
"I don't think the problem we face is a bill that people can't understand, I think the problem is rates that are too high," said energy critic Peter Tabuns. "Fifteen…