Duke raises cost estimate for Indiana coal project

HOUSTON, TEXAS - Duke Energy Corp raised the cost estimate for its proposed clean-coal gasification plant in Indiana by $365 million, to $2.35 billion, in a filing with state regulators.

In a release, Duke said the increased cost would boost electric rates by 2 percent. Construction costs were already expected to raise rates 18 percent.

In November, the Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission granted Duke permission to build the 630-megawatt Edwardsport integrated gasification combined cycle (IGCC) plant. Commission approval is needed for additional costs to complete the plant, Duke said.

Duke blamed rising costs on international competition for materials and on higher labor costs. The plant is scheduled to be completed in 2012.

IGCC is a technology that can convert coal to a synthetic gas, allowing pollutants to be separated from the gas before combustion. The syngas is used in a combined-cycle power plant to generate electricity.

Viewed as a way to reduce pollution while using plentiful U.S. coal supplies, only a few IGCC projects are moving forward because of rising costs and uncertainty over future regulation of carbon dioxide, a greenhouse gas blamed for global warming.

"In the Midwest, coal is plentiful and relatively low-cost, and finding ways to burn it cleanly is fundamental to meeting our customers' demand for power," said Jim Stanley, president of Duke Energy Indiana.

"If we didn't pursue this project, our primary alternative would be to rely on natural gas." While gas plants are much cheaper to build, "gas prices and supplies are volatile and unpredictable," he said.

If built, the Edwardsport plant will produce 10 times as much power as existing units at the site but will emit less sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxide and mercury and less carbon dioxide per megawatt-hour than the 50-year-old units which will be retired, Duke said.

IGCC technology also makes it possible to store or sequester the carbon dioxide underground.

Duke also asked for approval to study the costs and the site's suitability for capturing and storing some of the carbon dioxide, Duke said.

"Our goal is to make this one of the nation's first demonstrations of carbon capture and sequestration at a power plant," Stanley said.

Environmental groups oppose federal tax credits which have been granted to the project.

Related News

franklin energy

Franklin Energy and Consumers Energy Support Small Businesses During COVID-19 with Virtual Energy Coaching

PORT WASHINGTON - Franklin Energy, a leading provider in energy efficiency and grid optimization solutions, announced today that they will implement Consumers Energy's Small Business Virtual Energy Coaching Service in response to the COVID-19 pandemic.

This Michigan-wide offering to natural gas, electric and combination small business customers provides a complimentary virtual energy-coaching service to help small businesses find ways to benefit from a reduction in their utility costs, both now during COVID-19 and into the future. To be eligible for the program, small businesses must have electric usage at or below 1,200,000 kWh annually and gas usage at or below 15,000…

READ MORE
turkey in the oven

Christmas electricity spike equivalent to roasting 1.5 million turkeys: BC Hydro

READ MORE

yukon nuclear

Modular nuclear reactors a 'long shot' worth studying, says Yukon gov't

READ MORE

clean grid laboratories

From smart meters to big batteries, co-ops emerge as clean grid laboratories

READ MORE

How Electricity Gets Priced in Europe and How That May Change

READ MORE