Substation Relay Protection Training
Our customized live online or in‑person group training can be delivered to your staff at your location.
- Live Online
- 12 hours Instructor-led
- Group Training Available
Bruce Power alpha particle exposure surfaced during refurbishment at Bruce A Unit 1, prompting CNSC scrutiny, dosimetry testing at Chalk River lab, and radiation safety controls in the nuclear vault after atypical beta/alpha ratios.
Essential Takeaways
2009 Bruce A Unit 1 incident: up to 195 workers faced alpha intake; tests found doses below limits, with no public risk.
- 195 workers to be tested; 14 results below safety limits.
- Single Chalk River lab processes ~10 alpha bioassays per week.
- Alpha harms if ingested; cannot penetrate skin; no public spread.
- Beta readings normal; alpha flagged by airborne sample on Nov 26.
- Area contained with partition and PPE; contractors formed most.
Workers potentially exposed to nuclear radiation at a Bruce nuclear power plant near Kincardine, Ont., last November could wait as long as 14 more weeks for results because of a lack of accredited testing facilities, a hearing learned recently.
Bruce Power executive vice-president Norm Sawyer told a Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission (CNSC) hearing investigating the incident that the workers most likely to be exposed to radiation in late November 2009 have already been tested.
Results from tests of 14 of these workers have come back since testing began in January and showed radiation levels below regulatory safety limits, said Sawyer.
About 192 workers may have been exposed in November to alpha particles at the Bruce A Unit 1 reactor as work was being done to refurbish the plant, said Maureen McQueen, Bruce Power's radiation protection programs manager. A total of 195 employees will be tested for radiation as part of the program, she said.
Most of the workers were contractors, McQueen said, with only about a quarter employees of Bruce Power.
A CNSC preliminary report initially put the number of potentially exposed workers at 217, but that number went down as investigators looked more closely at the incident, McQueen said.
But so far only 50 samples have been sent away for testing, she said, because there is only one CNSC- accredited facility in Canada for testing for alpha particles — an Atomic Energy of Canada lab at Chalk River — and the lab can only process 10 samples per week, while Cameco structural claims were refuted in separate cases highlighting broader industry scrutiny.
Alpha particles consist of two protons and two neutrons — like the nucleus of a helium atom — and are produced during alpha decay from heavy radioactive material. They can damage human tissue and cause cancer, but the particles are too large to penetrate human skin and normally pose a danger only if ingested.
CNSC safety inspectors said there were no immediate health concerns for workers and that there was no indication the radiation spread outside the nuclear vault and so it posed no danger to the public, and the site had previously upgraded security after terrorist attacks to bolster confidence.
The commission questioned Bruce executives as part of an industry-wide investigation on why alpha particles were not detected earlier and why work continued into December after they were detected.
Sawyer told the commission that nuclear inspectors normally don't test for alpha particles, because they tend to appear in a relative proportion to beta particles — or high-energy electrons — the more common form of radiation at nuclear facilities. Beta particle levels are routinely tested at nuclear facilities, and beta tests were normal at the site.
The higher-than expected levels of alpha particles were discovered after a routine airborne sample taken on the morning of November 26 at the plant threw up some red flags, and a subsequent test confirmed the presence of alpha particles two days later.
Bruce inspectors said work on feeder tubes inside the Bruce A Unit 1 nuclear vault that began on Nov. 24 likely stirred up some loose particulate in the tubes. Work continued in the nuclear vault, but after a sealed partition was put in place to contain the area and all workers in the area were required to wear the proper safety equipment.
The company said the workers who may have been affected were removed from duty. They described this as a "conservative" action given the amount of radiation that was detected and ongoing worker safety concerns at the site.
Bruce Power, a private nuclear utility that generates about a fifth of Ontario's electricity, operates six reactors at a former Ontario Hydro site on Lake Huron, and it has previously fired dozens in a code-of-conduct probe according to reports.
Related News
Related News
Brenmiller Energy and New York Power Authority Showcase Thermal Storage Success
In Europe, A Push For Electricity To Solve The Climate Dilemma
U.S. power demand seen sliding 1% in 2023 on milder weather
Opinion: Germany's drive for renewable energy is a cautionary tale
The Innovative Solution Bringing Electricity To Crisis Stricken Areas
Europe's stunted hydro & nuclear output may hobble recovery drive
Sign Up for Electricity Forum’s Newsletter
Stay informed with our FREE Newsletter — get the latest news, breakthrough technologies, and expert insights, delivered straight to your inbox.
Electricity Today T&D Magazine Subscribe for FREE
- Timely insights from industry experts
- Practical solutions T&D engineers
- Free access to every issue