Ontario green tax illegal, study says

subscribe

A $53.7 million fee imposed on electricity users to support green energy programs is not just expensive, its illegal, says a study prepared for the C.D. Howe Institute.

Thats because the fee is really a tax, says the study. And taxes must be approved by the Legislature.

Almost any economist would say its an indirect tax, says Finn Poschmann of C.D. Howe, who coauthored the study with University of Toronto law professor Benjamin Alarie.

The levy was imposed ahead of the provincial budget it will cost a typical customer about $4 a year.

The money is earmarked for conservation and renewable energy programs, including home energy audits and a program that helps industrial and commercial firms switch to solar power.

The regulation creating the new fee directs the Ontario Energy Board to assess a levy on local utilities like Toronto Hydro, and on the Independent Electricity System Operator, in proportion to the amount of power they distribute.

The levy could be called a fee used to recover the costs of delivering renewable energy, the authors acknowledge.

On the other hand, as there is nothing about the fee that closely connects it to the cost of electricity that ratepayers consume, there is little to distinguish it from any other provincial taxing and spending program, they argue.

The advantage of raising money through regulation is that it is quiet, and achieved with a minimum of debate, they say.

Yet it is against the public interest for the government to impose taxation through regulation... Taxation through regulation is taxation without representation.

But taxpayers could challenge the fee in its current format, said Poschmann. There is precedent for such actions, he noted – although theres also precedent for legislatures retroactively approving the previously illegal taxes, and keeping the money they raised.

Energy minister Brad Duguid rejected the analysis, saying the Green Energy Act gives the governments authority for the province to create conservation programs and recover the costs through hydro rates.

Its an important investment, he added. Conservation programs funded by the new fee gives consumers tools to lower their overall energy bill, he argued.

Related News

mobile gas turbine power plant

USAID Delivers Mobile Gas Turbine Power Plant to Ukraine

KYIV - Deputy U.S. Administrator Isobel Coleman announced during her visit to Kyiv that the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) has provided the Government of Ukraine with a mobile gas turbine power plant purchased from General Electric (GE).

The mobile power plant was manufactured in the United States by GE’s Gas Power business and has a total output capacity of approximately 28MW, which is enough to provide the equivalent electricity to at least 100,000 homes. This will help Ukraine increase the supply of electricity to homes, hospitals, schools, critical infrastructure providers, and other institutions. The mobile power plant can be…

READ MORE
pense morrison

Australia stuck in the middle of the US and China as tensions rise

READ MORE

Site C Dam

OPINION | Bridging the electricity gap between Alberta and B.C. makes perfect climate sense

READ MORE

alberta wind power

'Transformative change': Wind-generated electricity starting to outpace coal in Alberta

READ MORE

wind turbines in scotland

Scottish Wind Delivers Equivalent Of 98% Of Country’s October Electricity Demand

READ MORE