AECL could lose deal to build Ontario reactors to Areva


CSA Z462 Arc Flash Training – Electrical Safety Compliance Course

Our customized live online or in‑person group training can be delivered to your staff at your location.

  • Live Online
  • 6 hours Instructor-led
  • Group Training Available
Regular Price:
$249
Coupon Price:
$199
Reserve Your Seat Today
Canada's atomic agency which spent $600 million of taxpayers' money building a couple of nuclear medicine reactors that don't work, is now vying for one of the biggest government contracts in this country's history.

The government-owned Atomic Energy of Canada (AECL) is the only domestic firm of three bidders in the running to build two new Ontario power reactors at a cost of up to $14 billion.

But the problem-plagued agency and its proposed nuclear technologies are both so dubious that it may be up to a French company to save the Canadian nuclear industry.

More on that in a moment.

Atomic Energy was recently in the news as the agency behind the so-called Maple debacle, new mini-reactors that were supposed to produce radioactive medical isotopes used to test and treat thousands of cancer patients every week.

Instead, by the time the Conservative government pulled the plug on the whole Maple project last year, the reactors were 500% over budget, 10 years late and didn't work.

While the massive power reactors that Atomic Energy is proposing to build in Ontario have little in common with the disastrous medical Maples, the agency is once again offering another new, untried design that isn't even off the drawing board yet.

The so-called Advanced Candu Reactor, or ACR 1000, is supposed to put Canada back in the forefront of a global nuclear industry now suddenly mushrooming as a source of green power.

Maybe someday. But for now, with Ontario just months from awarding the mother of all nuclear contracts, Atomic Energy's offering of a reactor that doesn't exist, is understandably causing no end of radioactive heartburn inside government.

All things being equal, hiring the federal nuclear agency to build reactors for provincial power authorities would be a no-brainer.

For one thing, at stake is a massive amount of public money that would be nice to keep in Canadian hands.

The two Ontario reactors alone are expected to cost up to $14 billion.

But insiders in the Canadian nuclear industry say that whoever lands the Ontario deal will be strongly positioned to snag similar mega-projects being discussed in New Brunswick, Alberta and Saskatchewan.

Taxpayers also have a fortune already invested in Atomic Energy and its new Candu reactor design.

Documents obtained by the Canadian Press show over $1 billion of public funds going to the agency just in this year and last.

That includes over $400 million directly into designing the new Candu.

Finally, there is a growing consensus in the industry that the Ontario reactor deal is pretty well do or die for Atomic Energy.

If the Ontario contract goes to one of the other bidders — the French giant Areva, or Westinghouse owned by Toshiba — so likely will the other Canadian deals.

On the flip side, any government investing billions in a new reactor will naturally want to be sure it is the best value for taxpayers' money — and that it works.

AECL's record of over-budget projects is so profound that it is doubtful any provincial government would order a Candu without a federal guarantee against cost overruns.

Enter the French bidder, Areva, a company that is already building its 100th reactor of the type being proposed for Ontario.

Bids for the Ontario mega-deal closed last month with a final decision expected in June.

But sources say Areva has since taken the extraordinary step of offering to licence its own proven reactor technology to AECL, and effectively partner on the Ontario project.

The deal would give Ontario proven reactor technology, while keeping AECL and its highly-skilled workforce in business until the Candu is ready for market.

Whether that deal or another, taxpayers can only pray common sense prevails.

Related News

FPL Proposes Significant Rate Hikes Over Four Years

FPL Rate Increase Proposal 2026-2029 outlines $9B base-rate hikes as Florida grows, citing residential demand,…
View more

RBC agrees to buy electricity from new southern Alberta solar power farm project

RBC Renewable Energy PPA supports a 39 MW Alberta solar project, with Bullfrog Power and…
View more

Will Israeli power supply competition bring cheaper electricity?

Israel Electricity Reform Competition opens the supply segment to private suppliers, challenges IEC price controls,…
View more

IAEA - COVID-19 and Low Carbon Electricity Lessons for the Future

Nuclear Power Resilience During COVID-19 shows low-carbon electricity supporting renewables integration with grid flexibility, reliability,…
View more

Atlantic grids, forestry, coastlines need rethink in era of intense storms: experts

Atlantic Canada Hurricane Resilience focuses on climate change adaptation: grid hardening, burying lines, coastline resiliency…
View more

Experts Question Quebec's Push for EV Dominance

Quebec EV transition plan aims for 2 million electric vehicles by 2030 and bans new…
View more

Sign Up for Electricity Forum’s Newsletter

Stay informed with our FREE Newsletter — get the latest news, breakthrough technologies, and expert insights, delivered straight to your inbox.

Electricity Today T&D Magazine Subscribe for FREE

Stay informed with the latest T&D policies and technologies.
  • Timely insights from industry experts
  • Practical solutions T&D engineers
  • Free access to every issue

Download the 2026 Electrical Training Catalog

Explore 50+ live, expert-led electrical training courses –

  • Interactive
  • Flexible
  • CEU-cerified