A green sleight of hand

subscribe

Canadians do not want to see important infrastructure projects held up by pointlessly long environmental assessments that can be used by opponents to hijack good plans.

But nor do they want to see projects that are potentially damaging to the environment given cursory, rubber stamp approvals. And that is what makes Prime Minister Stephen Harper's changes to the nation's environmental assessment process, outlined in this month's throne speech and budget, so troubling.

If the government thought there were problems that need fixing – to ensure "improved environmental protection and greater certainty to industry," as stated in the throne speech – it ought to have explained publicly what the problems were and sought advice on the best possible reforms.

Instead, the government used its budget to announce that responsibility for environmental reviews of energy projects will be removed from the federal agency designed for that very purpose, and handed over to the National Energy Board, whose primary mandate is to develop the oil, gas and electric sectors. Assessments of nuclear projects will go to the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission.

This, coupled with the government's broader plans to remove what it calls "red tape" holding back businesses – which others call necessary environmental protections – raises questions about the underlying motivations for these changes.

Why strip reviews of energy projects – such as oil and gas pipelines – from the Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency, which has proven expertise and familiarity with the act's requirements?

It's easy enough to see how this can "accelerate regulatory review," as the budget states, but how exactly does it "improve" protections? Sierra Club Canada argues that the government used the budget to "begin dismantling the (Canadian) Environmental Assessment Agency."

Certainly, this is yet another indication that Harper's government continues to see economic growth and environmental protection as opposing principles. Protecting the environment does not spell an end to economic growth; governments can and must pursue both strategies simultaneously.

Indeed, Ontario is showing the way by pursuing green energy, such as wind and solar – creating jobs and economic investment without selling the environment short.

But, far from embracing the opportunities of a green economy, Ottawa peddles funding for carbon capture and storage projects as support for "clean energy solutions."

Responding to critics of the environmental assessment changes, federal Environment Minister Jim Prentice said the government wants a regulatory regime that "supports sustainable development and environmental practices."

That's what Canadians want, too. Unfortunately, there seems little hope that these changes will accomplish anything like those goals.

Related News

clary power lines

Electricity alert ends after Alberta forced to rely on reserves to run grid

CALGARY - Alberta's energy grid ran on reserves Wednesday, after multiple factors led to a supply shortage.

At 3:52 p.m. Wednesday, the Alberta Electric System Operator issued a Level 2 alert, meaning that reserves were being used to supply energy requirements and that load management procedures had been implemented. The alert ended at 6:06 p.m.

"This is due to unplanned generator outages, low wind and a reduction of import capability," the agency said in a post to social media. "Supply is tight but still meeting demand."

AESO spokesperson Mike Deising said the intertie with Saskatchewan had tripped off, and an issue on the…

READ MORE

National Energy Board hears oral traditional evidence over Manitoba-Minnesota transmission line

READ MORE

us solar and wind power future graph

Solar PV and wind power in the US continue to grow amid favourable government plans

READ MORE

City of Vancouver

City of Vancouver named Clean Energy Champion for Bloedel upgrades

READ MORE

co2 flame

Climate Solution: Use Carbon Dioxide to Generate Electricity

READ MORE