Paying more because of your postal code


NFPA 70b Training - Electrical Maintenance

Our customized live online or in‑person group training can be delivered to your staff at your location.

  • Live Online
  • 12 hours Instructor-led
  • Group Training Available
Regular Price:
$699
Coupon Price:
$599
Reserve Your Seat Today

Energy Postcode Lottery exposes regional pricing gaps in UK gas and electricity tariffs, as online plans vary by supplier; Cardiff vs Nottingham costs diverge, and switching via comparison sites can cut annual bills.

 

What You Need to Know

Regional variation in gas and electricity tariffs that makes identical users pay different bills, even online.

  • Average £100 regional gap on gas and electricity bills
  • ScottishPower variance up to £189 on identical plans
  • Cardiff priciest: £949 a year for online tariffs

 

Households are paying a premium every year for their energy simply because of their address, according to research from price comparison site uSwitch.

 

It revealed that prices for gas and electricity can vary by an average of £100 as household electricity bills fluctuate according to where you live.

"While suppliers choose to target ultra-competitive online plans regionally, such as EDF Energy in some cases, we will see a postcode lottery. Regional pricing is a key part of the competitive battlefield," says uSwitch's Ann Robinson, right.

ScottishPower, as a power giant operating nationwide, had the biggest inconsistency, charging up to £189 extra for customers living in different areas, despite their being on the same energy plan, paying in the same way and using the same amount of energy.

The most expensive place to live energy-wise is Cardiff, where online customers pay £949 a year on average, even as electricity bills rise elsewhere, while Nottingham is the cheapest with an average of £855 for online tariffs.

This discrepancy, uSwitch says, has been commonplace on standard energy plans but is now affecting online customers. Going online is still the cheapest way to pay for energy, but, says Ms Robinson: "The key thing is for consumers to minimise the impact, by making sure they move to the most competitive plan, even though switching doesn't always pay for some, with the most competitive supplier in their region."

Related News

Opinion: Fossil-fuel workers ready to support energy transition

Canada Net-Zero Transition unites energy workers, R&D, and clean tech to decarbonize steel and cement…
View more

Geothermal Power Plant In Hawaii Nearing Dangerous Meltdown?

Geothermal Power Plant Risks include hydrogen sulfide leaks, toxic gases, lava flow hazards, well blowouts,…
View more

New England's solar growth is creating tension over who pays for grid upgrades

New England Solar Interconnection Costs highlight distributed generation strains, transmission charges, distribution upgrades, and DAF…
View more

DOE Announces $28M Award for Wind Energy

DOE Wind Energy Funding backs 13 R&D projects advancing offshore wind, distributed energy, and utility-scale…
View more

PG&E pleads guilty to 85 counts in 2018 Camp Fire

PG&E Camp Fire Guilty Plea underscores involuntary manslaughter charges as the utility admits sparking Paradise's…
View more

N.L. premier says Muskrat Falls costs are too great for optimism about benefits

Muskrat Falls financial impact highlights a hydro megaproject's cost overruns, rate mitigation challenges, and inquiry…
View more

Sign Up for Electricity Forum’s Newsletter

Stay informed with our FREE Newsletter — get the latest news, breakthrough technologies, and expert insights, delivered straight to your inbox.

Electricity Today T&D Magazine Subscribe for FREE

Stay informed with the latest T&D policies and technologies.
  • Timely insights from industry experts
  • Practical solutions T&D engineers
  • Free access to every issue

Download the 2026 Electrical Training Catalog

Explore 50+ live, expert-led electrical training courses –

  • Interactive
  • Flexible
  • CEU-cerified