Ontario alliance touts Lower Churchill as alternative to nuclear


CSA Z462 Arc Flash Training – Electrical Safety Compliance Course

Our customized live online or in‑person group training can be delivered to your staff at your location.

  • Live Online
  • 6 hours Instructor-led
  • Group Training Available
Regular Price:
$249
Coupon Price:
$199
Reserve Your Seat Today
An Ontario environmental alliance says the proposed Lower Churchill Falls hydroelectric project is a better alternative to nuclear power in that province.

The development of the Lower Churchill Falls project in Labrador and hydroelectricity imports from Quebec can replace Ontario's aging nuclear reactors, according to a report released by the Ontario Clean Air Alliance.

Recommendation Three of the report, completed by the alliance's research arm, is for the Ontario's government to make a high priority of negotiating long-term electricity supply agreements with Hydro Quebec and Nalcor Energy, Newfoundland's energy corporation.

"It's a very good option, much lower cost and more reliable than new nuclear reactors," said Jack Gibbons, chairman of the alliance, a public-interest group of 90 different organizations in Ontario, including the City of Toronto and several other major cities in Ontario.

"Water power from Quebec and Labrador are Ontario's lowest-cost supply options for additional renewable electricity. The cost of water power from Quebec and Labrador would be at least 40 per cent lower than the cost of building new nuclear reactors at the Darlington Nuclear Generating Station east of Oshawa."

Gibbons said the idea of going with two new nuclear reactors will require a federal subsidy to Atomic Energy of Canada's costs, which could be seen as unfair to other provinces.

Hydroelectricity from the Lower Churchill Falls project has the potential to fill 28 per cent of Ontario's 2021 electricity supply gap at a cost of about six cents per kWh plus transmission costs, according to the alliance. The total market cost for Ontario consumers could be about nine cents per kWh, the alliance estimated.

The study quoted Moody's Investors Service as saying the cost of electricity from new nuclear power plants is likely to be at least 15.1 cents per kWh U.S. (about 18 cents Canadian as of May 2009).

"In addition, a history of cost overruns, late delivery, premature aging and unexpected breakdowns suggests that new nuclear reactors may be the least reliable option to meet Ontario's future electricity needs," the study said.

"Ontario has numerous options to replace the electricity produced each year by its aging nuclear power generators. Nevertheless, the government of Ontario is planning to sign, by June 20, 2009, a contract for the construction of two new nuclear reactors at the Darlington Nuclear Station east of Oshawa."

The study noted that the transmission service agreement Newfoundland and Labrador Hydro signed with Hydro Quebec requires Hydro Quebec to wheel power from the existing Churchill Falls generating station to the U.S./Canada border.

"This agreement creates a precedent for a future agreement which would facilitate the transmission of hydroelectricity from Labrador to Ontario via Hydro Quebec's transmission system," the alliance said.

Nalcor has said it remains confident it can finance the proposed Lower Churchill hydroelectric project, estimated at about $10 billion. Any project sanction date for the Lower Churchill likely won't happen until the summer or fall of 2010 — a year later than initially expected.

The project, if successful, will produce more than 3,000 megawatts — about 250 MW higher than previous estimates and enough to power 1.5 million homes.

Related News

Rolls-Royce expecting UK approval for mini nuclear reactor by mid-2024

Rolls-Royce SMR UK Approval underscores nuclear innovation as regulators review a 470 MW factory-built modular…
View more

Britain's National Grid Drops China-Based Supplier Over Cybersecurity Fears

National Grid Cybersecurity Component Removal signals NCSC and GCHQ oversight of critical infrastructure, replacing NR…
View more

New England Emergency fuel stock to cost millions

Inventoried Energy Program pays ISO-NE generators for fuel security to boost winter reliability, with FERC…
View more

Ameren, Safe Electricity urge safety near downed lines

Downed Power Line Vehicle Safety: Follow stay-in-the-car protocol, call 911, avoid live wires and utility…
View more

There's a Russia-Sized Mystery in China's Electricity Sector

China Power Demand-Emissions Gap highlights surging grid demand outpacing renewables, with coal filling shortages despite…
View more

Balancing Act: Germany's Power Sector Navigates Energy Transition

Germany January Power Mix shows gas-fired generation rising, coal steady, and nuclear phaseout impacts, amid…
View more

Sign Up for Electricity Forum’s Newsletter

Stay informed with our FREE Newsletter — get the latest news, breakthrough technologies, and expert insights, delivered straight to your inbox.

Electricity Today T&D Magazine Subscribe for FREE

Stay informed with the latest T&D policies and technologies.
  • Timely insights from industry experts
  • Practical solutions T&D engineers
  • Free access to every issue

Live Online & In-person Group Training

Advantages To Instructor-Led Training – Instructor-Led Course, Customized Training, Multiple Locations, Economical, CEU Credits, Course Discounts.

Request For Quotation

Whether you would prefer Live Online or In-Person instruction, our electrical training courses can be tailored to meet your company's specific requirements and delivered to your employees in one location or at various locations.