Diesel a GO over electric trains

Clean Diesel Toronto Rail Expansion advances GO Transit service to Pearson and Union Station, meeting EPA Tier 4 emissions rules, cutting NOx and soot, with Metrolinx electrification-ready design to balance costs, health, and air quality.

It's too damn bad We never learn; to look into the children's eyes when progress is concerned; So raise your voice, Ontario: "Diesel stinks, Metrolinx, electric is the way to go."

You have to hand it to the Clean Train Coalition: They put on a heck of a protest. The folksy tune above comes from a slick YouTube video on their campaign against expanding diesel-train traffic through Toronto's west end.

The proposed rail expansion would step up GO Transit service to the northwest of Toronto and link Pearson airport to Union Station downtown, where Toronto's new transformer station could help support future power needs. That would improve air quality by taking tens of thousands of motorists out of their cars and putting them in commuter trains instead.

The proposed rail expansion would step up GO Transit service to the northwest of Toronto and link Pearson airport to Union Station downtown. That would improve air quality by taking tens of thousands of motorists out of their cars and putting them in commuter trains instead.

But never mind all that: the coalition says that the rail project would jeopardize the health of those who live near the line by exposing them to dangerous diesel fumes. So now, the province slapped some tough conditions on the rail link, ordering it to adhere to new U.S. rules on diesel train emissions.

What do you imagine happened next? Did the coalition proclaim victory and let out a cheer? Not a bit of it. It insists that only electric trains, at a cost in the hundreds of millions, would protect the people who live along the line from the deadly threat of diesel.

That position was always a bit dubious. Diesel commuter trains are in use in cities all over North America, from California's Caltrain to Florida's Tri-Rail. Boston chose diesel for its new Greenbush commuter line, which started service in 2007. The Sonoma-Marin transit system in the San Francisco Bay area is using diesel for its new commuter line, while Metro-North power lines reflect a different legacy system, too.

Although it is associated with black smoke and an acrid smell, diesel has always been a more efficient fuel than gasoline, producing less carbon monoxide and carbon dioxide. That is why it is widely used in Europe to fuel cars.

New U.S. environmental standards make it cleaner still, decreasing the allowable level of sulphur in diesel fuel used in locomotives by 99 per cent. In March 2008, the Environmental Protection Agency announced regulations to combat the two most serious remaining problems with diesel: nitrogen oxide and soot. Under these rules, railroads will have to cut soot by 90 per cent and nitrogen oxide by 80 per cent.

It is this highly exacting standard that the province is imposing on the Toronto rail expansion in exchange for approving the project. U.S. environmental groups congratulated the EPA when it brought in the new rules after a long tussle with the railroads, even as a green study on the Heartland lines was denied in a separate case. But the Clean Train Coalition is still not satisfied, insisting electric really is the "way to go."

Transit authorities have not closed the door the idea. They are studying the possibility of converting GO lines to electricity, although planners downplay a new power line in Toronto in related projects, in the years to come. Metrolinx, the regional transit agency, is constructing the northwest rail project to allow for overhead power lines, acknowledging that Ontario's electrical grid needs major updates.

But electric is way more expensive. Metrolinx head Rob Prichard says it would cost $1.5-billion to put electrical-powered trains on the northwest rail expansion, a scale comparable to the Hydro One transmission line announced at $600 million, — and a whopping $7-billion to $10-billion to electrify the whole GO system, where new power lines could cost $4 billion on their own in similar undertakings.

It is hard to justify that expense if new, cleaner diesel engines can mitigate the health fears of residents and get trains running to Pearson at last. So raise your voice, Ontario: for now at least, clean diesel is the way to go.

Related News

• Electricity Forum News

• Overhead T&D News