Judge sends dispute over permit to trial

subscribe

A dispute that Alcoa Inc. needs resolved before it can get a new license to operate a series of hydropower dams in the state is headed to trial after a judge rejected requests for a quick decision.

State Administrative Law Judge Joe Webster said he'll need a trial later this month before he can decide the dispute over a certificate issued last year by the Division of Water Quality.

The division certified that if conditions it set were followed, Alcoa's wholly owned subsidiary, Alcoa Power Generating Inc., can operate the dams while protecting nearly 40 miles of the river and its reservoirs.

"Based upon the evidence presented it appears that multiple material and factual issues are in dispute," Webster wrote in his ruling on a request for summary judgment in the case.

Pittsburgh-based Alcoa is fighting to renew an expired license to operate Yadkin River dams built decades ago to supply electricity to an aluminum smelting plant. The Stanly County plant once employed hundreds but is now shuttered.

The fight centers on whether Alcoa can keep selling electricity to high-paying commercial customers. The company estimated in 2006 that the dams generated almost $44 million a year in revenues from hydroelectric power generation, a figure that could multiply as demand for clean power booms.

Gov. Beverly Perdue, her predecessor Mike Easley and Stanly County officials have opposed the company's re-licensing bid. They hope to encourage local job growth attracted by dam-generated electricity and greater freedom to draw river water.

Once the fight over the state certification is settled, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission could consider renewing the company's license for up to 50 more years.

Related News

electricity

Judge: Texas Power Plants Exempt from Providing Electricity in Emergencies

AUSTIN - Nearly three years after the devastating Texas blackout of 2021, a panel of judges from the First Court of Appeals in Houston has determined that major power companies cannot be held accountable for their failure to deliver electricity during the crisis, citing Texas' deregulated energy market as the reason.

This ruling appears likely to shield these companies from lawsuits that were filed against them in the aftermath of the blackout, leaving the families of those affected uncertain about where to seek justice.

In February 2021, a severe cold front swept over Texas, bringing extended periods of ice and snow. The…

READ MORE
houston substation

Electric Cooperatives, The Lone Shining Utility Star Of The Texas 2021 Winter Storm

READ MORE

ball and oregan talks

No public details for Newfoundland electricity rate mitigation talks

READ MORE

bc ferries hybrid ship

BC Ferries celebrates addition of hybrid ships

READ MORE

climate change denial

$1 billion per year is being spent to support climate change denial

READ MORE